CA is Least Educated - NY leads in population loss

T

TJustice

1. New data from the U.S. Census Bureau says New York tops the nation in population loss.

https://cbs6albany.com/news/local/new-york-leads-nation-in-population-loss-census-bureau

2. Least-Educated State: California No. 1 in Percentage of Residents 25 and Older Who Never Finished 9th Grade; No. 50 in High School Graduates

(CNSNews.com) - California ranks No. 1 among the 50 states for the percentage of its residents 25 and older who have never completed ninth grade and 50th for the percentage who have graduated from high school, according to new data from the Census Bureau.

9.7 percent of California residents 25 and older, the Census Bureau says, never completed ninth grade. Only 82.5 percent graduated from high school.

more at link...
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...e-california-no-1-percentage-residents-25-and


--

 
certainly there are lots of smart mofos in Cali...
but this doesn't surprise me...
My closest friend works in LAUSD...
She says that the high school across from her middle school had a 50% drop out rate in Grade 9...
50%!!!!!
That's insane...
 
Who needs an education when guaranteed income is right around the corner. Everyone can pursue all of their creative artistic dreams. I can only imagine what will pass for art and music in the future.
 
TJustice said:
1. New data from the U.S. Census Bureau says New York tops the nation in population loss.
More...
Yup, by 0.25% and all the estimates go down to a single human in precision, e.g. voting age population of "253,768,092" (lol, what?). Which makes me wonder what their sampling error is in real life - I am sure it's on the web site somewhere. For example, I did not participate in the census despite getting the forms, how does that effect the estimates?
 
Okay. Precision is preferable.

But... if we had more accurate data perhaps we would find significantly more of the under educated in CA did not fill out the census?

sle said:
Yup, by 0.25% and all the estimates go down to a single human in precision, e.g. voting age population of "253,768,092" (lol, what?). Which makes me wonder what their sampling error is in real life - I am sure it's on the web site somewhere. For example, I did not participate in the census despite getting the forms, how does that effect the estimates?
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top