OK give me some sort of fundamental reason why we should change the definition of marriage to allow two men or two women but not 2 women and a man or 2 men and a women.
What makes two men superior to 2 men and a women?
I will be happy to consider both legal arguments and rational arguments.
I am not even looking for constitutionally compelling arguments - just a logical breakdown of the reason for your discrimination.
===
To answer jane - I have not researched the answer. But, if a trangender person gets to be a new gender on their drivers license - I bet they will satisfy the constitutional requirement of a man and a women. We shall see..
What makes two men superior to 2 men and a women?
I will be happy to consider both legal arguments and rational arguments.
I am not even looking for constitutionally compelling arguments - just a logical breakdown of the reason for your discrimination.
===
To answer jane - I have not researched the answer. But, if a trangender person gets to be a new gender on their drivers license - I bet they will satisfy the constitutional requirement of a man and a women. We shall see..