C19 diagnostic criteria coincidentally adjusted on Biden day

Biden is now the President. Trump is gone. Whether or not you find this a good thing (I think it is a better thing, which isn't the same as saying it is a "good" thing) or not, you have to laugh at the WHO changing the diagnostic criteria in a way that will now probably result in less COVID cases than before. The narratives, they will be a changin'.

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05

EsNLAXwW8AYn3Tu




I'd love to hear the other side of the story that tells us why the CDC and WHO actually cared about false positives in previous pandemics, but not now. I'm genuinely interested in a fact-based reason why C19 would be different.


I know this will make GWB (and some others here) apoplectic. I'm happy to listen to why this is not what it appears to be.
 
Pretty soon extreme liberal media is going to say that we got Corona Virus under control thanks to the leadership of Joe Biden. No need to worry about getting Corona Virus. It has been wiped totally, absolutely, clean. Now, if you believe that, I got some swamp land I would like to sell you for $10,000,000 which you can turn into a luxurious retirement home of ET trolls. So that, they can recall the days they hated President Donald Trump with every fiber of their being. My bad, they still will hate him till their last days.
 
Quit reading ZH, not everything's a conspiracy

First, this wasn't from ZH. ZH might have covered it, but if they did that's not where I saw it.

Second, you might try actually refuting information presented instead of just your usual "zerohedge lol" response. Might offer some credibility to your posting. Might.
 
First, this wasn't from ZH. ZH might have covered it, but if they did that's not where I saw it.

Second, you might try actually refuting information presented instead of just your usual "zerohedge lol" response. Might offer some credibility to your posting. Might.
You might actually do some work to offer credibility to your claim of being an executive rather then some random political poster from Russia.
 
You might actually do some work to offer credibility to your claim of being an executive rather then some random political poster from Russia.

I've offered many folks who have challenged this a private bet. All have declined. What about you?
 
How do you possibly have the time to screw-off all day on here?

Because i don't screw off all day here?

As I have said many times - there are some days where I have a shit-ton to do and I'm not on for a week at a time. Others, I've got a whole lot of nothing and there's time to kill. Still others, like today, I've got a lot of calls where I'm on to listen (and I'm listening) but there's nothing actionable for me to do. And I have a spectacular team I've hired.

So, shall we bet or would you like to withdraw the challenge?
 
First, this wasn't from ZH. ZH might have covered it, but if they did that's not where I saw it.

Second, you might try actually refuting information presented instead of just your usual "zerohedge lol" response. Might offer some credibility to your posting. Might.
ain't nobody got time to refute every opinion and quack conspiracy that props up on twitter. I stick to news. You should do some self-reflection:
Ah, see this is the crux of the issue. If people viewed these organizations as entertainment, then there wouldn't be any issue. The problem is they are the NEWS. Or the actual news is no more and this is what we are left with.
 
Because i don't screw off all day here?

As I have said many times - there are some days where I have a shit-ton to do and I'm not on for a week at a time. Others, I've got a whole lot of nothing and there's time to kill. Still others, like today, I've got a lot of calls where I'm on to listen (and I'm listening) but there's nothing actionable for me to do. And I have a spectacular team I've hired.

So, shall we bet or would you like to withdraw the challenge?
Let me guess? Someone who’s associated with this site can verify?
 
Back
Top