Oh Mav, you seem like a nice guy who gives people here useful information but you may be in over your head on this one. You should be more careful when you use the word certainly. I did not state opinion I stated fact. I offered to bring Don several accounts totaling well over 7 figures and he said he did not want to lend money to option traders because he made more money lending it to stock traders. Jeff and Rob have made recent changes to option accounts. Ron (Generic) does not want them either. I don't blame them for this, as an option position trader you may generate very little in commissions and interest for the firm so why would they want to lend you substantial risk capital.Quote from Maverick74:
This is certainly not true for Bright Trading or Echo. Also not true for VTrader.
So let's start with your firm VTrader. If, for example, I bring you 2M in accounts then you would need to lend us an additional 2M every night to cover the JBO haircut. We do not want to pay any interest, debit, capital or otherwise for this borrowed 2M since we would effectively get 2 to 1 leverage by using PM rather than the more stringent JBO haircut (with indicies) and we don't have to pay anything for it. I know you will want to argue this 2 to 1, but it is simply a mathematical fact for what we trade. We only want to pay .75/contract all in including all exchange, brokerage, regulatory fees, etc. since we get that with PM too. Additionally we get SIPC and additional private insurance to protect our accounts with PM so we would need something similar from you as well. We need software that has full option analytics and the ability to send multi leg complex orders electronically, and we don't want to pay for the software, quotes, or any registration fees since we don't have to with PM. So what does VTrader have to say?
I have no problem with pro/prop firms and they are a great idea for certain traders, but with a retail firm offering PM there is little reason for an option trader to go with you.