...
Would there be so much noise about it if they'd paid dividends instead? Dividends are economically identical to buybacks, but shareholders have to pay taxes on dividends but not on buybacks. How does it benefit shareholders to pay more taxes for no benefit whatsoever?
Not quite. First, 76% of all US stocks are held in tax-free accounts, so only a small percentage of recipients pay a tax on dividends, and furthermore at a lower tax rate. Second, a dividend payment provided an immediate economic benefit to the recipient. A stock buyback can only provide a benefit in the future, and only if the stock price and company earnings continue to grow.
With a max 20% tax rate, $0.80 of dividends today will always be worth more that the promise of $1 in gains from buyback in the future.
Last edited:
