The exact and immediate correlation between information and price is a false premise. Adaptation to new information is not instantaneous and at no point subsequently can ever be assumed to be complete.
This was very well written
The exact and immediate correlation between information and price is a false premise. Adaptation to new information is not instantaneous and at no point subsequently can ever be assumed to be complete.
%%It's at the new high for a reason. The underlying reason, a reflection of value, is more important than the price. Yes, the price might be high, but the question for any asset is what are you getting for the price? Buying a new high with strong volume shows conviction, both on the part of the new buyers as well as those short who decide to fold rather than hold.
I think buying highs in bear markets could work to. Just maybe not stocks. Like if guv bonds/gold/biotech are rallying you could definitely go for the ride. Afterall, the money has to go somewhere%%
Works well,ET180, good points; just dont keep on doing it in a 2008 bear markets-not that i think you would. For those those that study trends much =makes a lot of sense. BUT only for strong stocks/uptrending ........IBD teaches this,[Buy Hi depending .....400 or 500 book page system] Nothing in my post would suggest buy on any Hi in bear market stocks like GE; it cant seem to get above 50%. NOT a prediction or stock tip.![]()
Or used to work. That paper uses data ending in 2001!Relatedly, buying 52-week highs works, on average: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1104491
%%I think buying highs in bear markets could work to. Just maybe not stocks. Like if guv bonds/gold/biotech are rallying you could definitely go for the ride. Afterall, the money has to go somewhere

%%
TUSK has been in a weak sector; but could be a real big sharp[tusk type ]uptrend LOL![]()