Ah, gotcha.
No worries. Then simple to just flip it in reverse for similar principles.
IF I was under the gun, and someone told me that I had to by Naked Calls, and the periodicity was six or seven months? For instance? If there was a base underlying assumption that the stock market will rally for seven months? (
Note, I don't have that assumption. But I'm not saying it's wrong either. To trade, we all start out with our own base underlying assumptions).
Same thing, only in reverse.
I'd buy calls on the SPY, out six to eight months in the future ... with strikes three or four deep ITM.
Actually, as I give it more thought? That's probably the best way to approach it on the put side too.
Buy the calls, six to eight months in the future, with strikes three to four deep ITM. That way, if I'm right? Then hopefully the falling IV will help me enough to overcome some of the other math, and my delta's will thus improve with the passing of time (
though time is working against me). BUT IF I'm right, then that might be the best way to go. Mathematically speaking. Six to Eight Months in the future ... 4 or 5 strikes deep in the money.
At the moment, one of those Calls in June is going for about 16.50 or so ($1,650)
Now if you're WRONG? You didn't have as much tied up in going farther in the money.
But you can't hold them for the full six to seven months, or the theta is going to bleed out, and drain the worth of your option. You may want to look at options that are a year or two away, if your periodicity is six months.
But again, I have to stress? That's IF I was buying single naked call options, which I don't really do. I'd more prefer to buy Call Spreads, around .50 Deltas or so, 45 DTE, and keep rotating into new ones if I'm right.