You guys must be doing it wrong.
I still got ALL of my hair!! (Then again, I don't "average down". LOL!)
My 85 year old father still has all his hair--- not me LOL!
You guys must be doing it wrong.
I still got ALL of my hair!! (Then again, I don't "average down". LOL!)
say if you are going to buy 1000 shares and you enter 200 at 5.00, 200 at 4.50, 200 at $4.00 etc until you bought all 1000---- that is averaging down, correct?? That's what I mean-- not just aimlessly adding to losing positions
My 85 year old father still has all his hair--- not me LOL!

Truth is, that averaging down can work within an overall plan. Entering trades in stages is a time proven way to win on the upside or downside.
If I ever get the chance to talk with PTJ again-- I will ask him if that sign was photoshopped---
His local office is opening soon--
http://pbhfa.org/tudor-renovates-palm-beach-office/
surf
When hope takes over
Truth is, that averaging down can work within an overall plan. Entering trades in stages is a time proven way to win on the upside or downside.
If I ever get the chance to talk with PTJ again-- I will ask him if that sign was photoshopped---
His local office is opening soon--
http://pbhfa.org/tudor-renovates-palm-beach-office/
surf
Why don't you ask him? I'll bet he never "averaged down", either.
![]()

Assuming no averaging down until forever, which obviously leads to ruin.
There is a tremendous fundamental flaw of averaging down that you must realize.
Your worst losers are on full size, many winners on minimal size, that goes beyond the principles of good smart trading.
How do you feel about averaging into a winning trade?
I think history proves that if theoretically you were able to average down forever into a basket of stocks, you would win eventually due to the upward drift. Other markets, I am not so sure---