Quote from sjfan:
This is the point that's in dispute here. I disagree with this.
First, there has been periods of high gold-based inflations. The Spanish conquest of the new world was the most well known one.
Second, gold was once the obvious form of money used in international trade. It's no longer the case. And the world is no longer disconnected like it was. An economic failure in one part spreads via contagion.
Finally, so what if gold is beautiful and hard to mine? So is a LOT of things - some that are far more useful today than gold. Look at it this way, if the world goes Mad Max tomorrow, ammos, tin cans of food, and women will be currency. What is a gold bar going to do then? no one has any use for it.
All money is fiat.
..............

Quote from nravo:
Americans are impatient. But and hold mans buy and hold a broad-cased index, not a stock, for 20-plus years, not five or 10. Check the 20-to-25 year rolling returns. Out of the last 100 years, I think like 97 of them are positive and most largely so. If I were 45 or under right now, I a would absolutely have 100 % of an IRA in, say a SPY. If you are 45 and moved all your money there 12 months ago at the height of the market, you'll still come out on top but not until the end of the cycle. You just got hit by a worst case Monte Carlo situation, big losses in the front of a term.

Quote from Gyles:
Had come across an interesting article as follows:
Advisers Ditch 'Buy and Hold' For New Tactics
In the above, Matthew Tuttle had hired Mr. Murray for some trading systems. Can you please elaborate on that, Mr. Murray? Thanks!![]()