- Naked Put is the same as a Covered Call in terms of risk and profit potential
wtf
- Naked Put is the same as a Covered Call in terms of risk and profit potential
- Naked Put is the same as a Covered Call in terms of risk and profit potential - so that might make it easier to visualize the naked put.
Isn't that what James Cordier did, and got blown out of the universe on NG? Selling naked puts? Were it not for that example, I'd think selling naked puts is the bees' knees. But then I see all the "naked" call buying going on since the latest bull run from March and think, "Why is call buying so horrible to some people?" BWS tries to explain this to me every time we speak on Skype, and I never get it, heh.
Cordier sold naked calls. Risk was unbounded. At least with NPs underlying can "only" go to zero.![]()
CALL OPTION
I buy a CALL Option believing the stock will rise above my Strike price. I profit when I close that Option at a price above my Strike Price.
Both Option contracts profit when the Share Price rises above the Strike Price. If I believe that the Share price in Widget PLC is about to rise why would I choose one Option contract over the other?
Note1. I don’t hold any stock in Widget PLC.
Note2. I understand that the Premium received factors into the ‘profit’ equation with the Short Put Option
Ahh, so he sold the naked calls, contracts got called away from him on the NG spike, and he didn't have enough cash to cover the calls?
Only lasting bit I recall of that episode was thinking that the NG spike was so abrupt, and renormalized so quickly, it was meant for one purpose...To put that guy out of business.
re: It’s clearooh.... are you trying to encouraging me?
wherever you got your education from,
It’s clear you haven’t learned anything about trading - because you don’t post anything about trading on a trading website.
re: It’s clear
Take off your fogged up glasses.