But it's the women who are emotional and compulsive

So you support the "tyranny of the cities" -- exactly what the founding fathers were deliberately trying to avoid. Knowing that the residents of the cities would turn it into a situation where they were the ruling class, and the people living outside the cities turned into peasants who did all the work for the residents of the cities who sat back doing nothing except receive the benefits of others toiling.

On the other hand -- this is exactly what liberals want.

This is also why the second amendment was put into place -- to prevent this type of tyranny from happening. And BTW the people outside of cities own lots of guns in the U.S. and know how to use them. So when the liberals come to impose their will to make everyone their personal servants -- the citizens in non-urban areas will not abide by it.

As opposed to supporting the tyranny of square miles?
 
Sounds like to stand for the people from wealthy areas. Screw everyone else.

Good to know.

If they had the screw everyone else attitude, they won't be feeding the rural red states who act ungrateful for being fed.
 
I stand for people,not areas.Thought that was clear.

You believe that the people from a small number of counties which represent 64% of the American GDP should tyrannize everyone else. We already established that. You can't walk it back now.
 
You believe that the people from a small number of counties which represent 64% of the American GDP should tyrannize everyone else. We already established that. You can't walk it back now.

How exactly are they tyrannizing?

Majority will of the people should be ignored for the minority?
 
Back
Top