but her emails they said...

[wildchild]

Are we still talking about these emails?

 

[Amun Ra]

nat. def. sec endangers national security by releasing emails GOP said were of nat. sec. concern.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1314641332221227009

How can he endanger national security when it's just emails about Yoga and stuff?

 

[Cuddles]

How can he endanger national security when it's just emails about Yoga and stuff?

ic the point went over your head

 

[Amun Ra]

ic the point went over your head

No, I just flipped the script on you.

 

[Cuddles]

No, I just flipped the script on you.

not really, because me pointing the hypocrisy of the GOP talking points on precisely inconsequential emails was the point.

 

[exGOPer]

Crippled economy, race riots, record forest fires, police violence, pandemic, national unrest, impeding shit-show of an election, president is on horse steroids, possible civil war...

"But emails"

 

[smallfil]

People need to see the depth of the corruption in the Federal intelligence agencies. In any other country, traitors are rounded up, charged and jailed. Of course, you do not have top intelligence officials covering for the acts of the junior subordinates? All extreme liberal appointees of Barack Obama. He destroyed the professionalism of the FBI, CIA, etc. by packing it with extreme liberal appointees at the top positions who are only loyal to him.

 

[Cuddles]

what further defense do you have of your heroes GWB?

Clearly shows the reporting bias of both of these news sources.

And how many were reversed under Obama, Bush, and Clinton. There needs to be a frame of reference of how common a practice this is under previous administrations before any judgements can be made about it.

Any political biased person making accusations about the Trump administration needs to make a clear case that the number security denials being reversed is out of the norm compared to previous administrations.

If they can do this then they have a point.

(However the real point is that this is probably not any different than previous administrations.)

No I do not agree that any POTUS doing this is a problem. There may be very good reasons to override a denial. It is done in the military and defense industry regularly.

Provide us with how many overrides were done in previous administrations. I will reserve judgement till then. Mostly likely this has been a common practices since the 1950s in U.S. government.

This is a common practice in the Defense industry, military, and some departments of the federal government. How do you think all of those people who grew up behind the Iron Curtain got jobs in the government? It should not be surprising that a Presidential administration would also overturn denials of clearances.

You need to take a long list of Democratic presidents hiring friends and family. Let's start the discussion with JFK and look at the many other examples.

Do I think that there are political-biased federal employees? Yes. Many of them. Have some lost their careers to their bias? Yes, certainly.

 

[Cuddles]

what further defense do you have of your heroes GWB?

Heard your boy caught a contempt case GWB? Damn...