Firstly, people act like the entire fate of the US is determined by one man. There is a hell of a lot more to our political system then just the President.
Have you seen ANY improvement in your life since the Dems took over congress TWO years ago?
Secondly, that guy had a very tough hand to deal with. 911, War on Terror, and a bubble economy. As opposed to Bill Clinton, who had very little in the way of foreign or domestic problems to deal with.
He may or may not have chosen the wrong path in Iraq, but we won't likely know that outcome for years to come, so save the Iraq stuff.
As for the economy, let's face it. There is much more to that than the US President. Is it Bush's fault that Ford and GM were hemoraging money during the best of times?
Was it Bush's fault that the rating's agencies completely mispriced the mortgage derivitives?
Was it his fault that the average American is up to his eye's in CC debt or took out 125% to value loans on their house?
I realize that Bush didn't solve many of the problems that arose during his presidency and ha certainly appointed some pretty inept people (Paulson, Rumsfeld), but please don't act like he was alone in all this.
Our entire political system is corrupt and inept. Ask yourself if you really feel like Gore (certifiably insane) or Kerry (just as much of a dunce as Bush) would have been any better.
The only difference if either of those two would have won, would be we wouldn't be in Iraq, and I'm not yet convinced that that won't end up being the right move afterall.
I guess the other thing that would be different, is that much more of our tax dollars would be going toward the myth that is wind and solar energy.
Have you seen ANY improvement in your life since the Dems took over congress TWO years ago?
Secondly, that guy had a very tough hand to deal with. 911, War on Terror, and a bubble economy. As opposed to Bill Clinton, who had very little in the way of foreign or domestic problems to deal with.
He may or may not have chosen the wrong path in Iraq, but we won't likely know that outcome for years to come, so save the Iraq stuff.
As for the economy, let's face it. There is much more to that than the US President. Is it Bush's fault that Ford and GM were hemoraging money during the best of times?
Was it Bush's fault that the rating's agencies completely mispriced the mortgage derivitives?
Was it his fault that the average American is up to his eye's in CC debt or took out 125% to value loans on their house?
I realize that Bush didn't solve many of the problems that arose during his presidency and ha certainly appointed some pretty inept people (Paulson, Rumsfeld), but please don't act like he was alone in all this.
Our entire political system is corrupt and inept. Ask yourself if you really feel like Gore (certifiably insane) or Kerry (just as much of a dunce as Bush) would have been any better.
The only difference if either of those two would have won, would be we wouldn't be in Iraq, and I'm not yet convinced that that won't end up being the right move afterall.
I guess the other thing that would be different, is that much more of our tax dollars would be going toward the myth that is wind and solar energy.