Bush lawyers off the hook for torture policy

Here is how the Bastards on the Left work: they accuse, and they get all their minion trolls to keep up the accusations, then when there is no proof they move on to the next accusation... some of them don't get the word and they keep up with accusations that have already been defended in court of course, that serves as a reminder to all the rest to keep on accusing...
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

I can't believe that you are calling me immune to reason, while not even addressing anything that I've said. I NEVER said every detainee has something to confess... never said it, nor did I imply it. Just as I haven't said anything that u accuse me of such as "you like torture". This is just more of your bullshit, I don't think your that stupid sooo... your a liar. Anyone can take things out of context and change the subject etc, but you can't even answer the simple question that I asked at the end of my last post.

So I ask again: If you had an al-qaeda operative in custody and reliable intel that there was an imminent attack on the US, but this prisoner won't talk, is torture acceptable?

If u can't answer this simple hypo or at least stick to your OWN topic, then I'm finished with this thread.
You are the liar, I have addressed plenty of what you said. But like every other rightwingnut, you close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears and ignore answers you don't like.

Clearly exchanging further posts with you is a waste of time. BTW I never said the torturers should be tried. The DoJ was investigating the suits who gave the go-ahead for torture: they are the ones who should be on trial.

Torture is not acceptable. Here's why:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2302-2005Jan11.html

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/an_fbi_interrogator_on_the_effectiveness_of_torture/

http://blog.nola.com/guesteditorials/2009/04/how_effective_is_torture_not_v.html

I found those articles with a simple google search. It never ceases to amaze me how many righties are google-challenged. You'd much rather rant and rave and spew utter nonsense than do a simple search to resolve an issue.

Just one more waste of my time to add to my ignore list:

piggy >>>> ignore
 
Quote from maxpi:

You are jealous. All the other people have all the fun while you stand on the sidelines whining.. you'll get over it eventually, or not..... no sweat off our balls either way...
So your idea of fun is torturing people. I am not surprised. You've proven to be another colossal waste of my time:

magpie >>> ignore
 
Quote from kut2k2:

So your idea of fun is torturing people. I am not surprised. You've proven to be another colossal waste of my time:

magpie >>> ignore

So if I'm on ignore this asshole can't see me... Hey kunt2k2, you're a piece of useless shit btw... a job awaits you, you can stand outside a doctor's office making people sick starting today... I don't want to be the one to tell you but when things collapse, your dream of marching in and assuming power will not happen, sorry... I hope you are not as ugly as your mother too... ok, bye now, thanks for stopping by...
 
Quote from kut2k2:

1) You are the liar, I have addressed plenty of what you said. But like every other rightwingnut, you close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears and ignore answers you don't like.

Clearly exchanging further posts with you is a waste of time. BTW I never said the torturers should be tried. The DoJ was investigating the suits who gave the go-ahead for torture: they are the ones who should be on trial.

2) Torture is not acceptable. Here's why:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2302-2005Jan11.html

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/an_fbi_interrogator_on_the_effectiveness_of_torture/

http://blog.nola.com/guesteditorials/2009/04/how_effective_is_torture_not_v.html

I found those articles with a simple google search. It never ceases to amaze me how many righties are google-challenged. You'd much rather rant and rave and spew utter nonsense than do a simple search to resolve an issue.

Just one more waste of my time to add to my ignore list:

piggy >>>> ignore

Hopefully someone quotes me because coward kut2k made a lame arguement and put me on ignore.

1) please cite one instance where I lied, just one.

2) Amazing. You post 3 EDITORIALS written by individuals that are not experts in "enhanced interrogation", and decide that is EVIDENCE that torture is ineffective? They also admit that the jury is still out as it relates to the effectiveness of the methods in question. Let me ask u: If torture doesn't work why the hell was it ever implemented in the first place?

You post this drivel and put me on ignore. Meanwhile u still haven't answered the original question, what a pussy.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

Hopefully someone quotes me because coward kut2k made a lame arguement and put me on ignore.

1) please cite one instance where I lied, just one.

2) Amazing. You post 3 EDITORIALS written by individuals that are not experts in "enhanced interrogation", and decide that is EVIDENCE that torture is ineffective? They also admit that the jury is still out as it relates to the effectiveness of the methods in question. Let me ask u: If torture doesn't work why the hell was it ever implemented in the first place?

You post this drivel and put me on ignore. Meanwhile u still haven't answered the original question, what a pussy.

This camel toe has everyone on ignore who doesn't agree with "it". It's the usual tactic of the disillusioned left, facts be damned.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

This camel toe has everyone on ignore who doesn't agree with "it". It's the usual tactic of the disillusioned left, facts be damned.

Thank you.
 
Back
Top