So the 19 scientists who saw the movie are going to risk their reputation lying about the science....
Oy vey...
Oy vey...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bush admits the global warming results from fossil fuels....
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
So the 19 scientists who saw the movie are going to risk their reputation lying about the science....
Oy vey...
You're missing the point ENTIRELY.
There is no universal consensus, and to suggest there is, is a complete an utter LIE
Perhaps the other 81 think Gore is a joke ...
I'll stick with the MIT atomospheric prof.
http://opinionjournal.com/editorial...tml?id=95000606
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220
Mr. Lindzen is Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT.
There was universal consensus among those who did see it, and I doubt they are all lying.
Quote from pattersb:
You're missing the point ENTIRELY.
[size=3There is no universal consensus, and to suggest there is, is a complete an utter LIE[/size]
I'll stick with the MIT atomospheric prof.
http://opinionjournal.com/editorial...tml?id=95000606
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220
Mr. Lindzen is Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
There was universal consensus among those who did see it, and I doubt they are all lying.
Again, they VOLUNTARILY ran out and saw the movie. That is hardly a random sample of atomospheric experts. They demonstrated a pre-disposition of supporting Gore's viewpoint by doing so.
If any of the 81/100 of reciepients that didn't respond thought Gore was a crackpot, tool, OR they feared the reprecussions of disagreeing with this "inconvenient truth" they would not have bothered answering or wasting their money on it.
Therefore, this MEANS NEXT TO NOTHING in the argument of whether a "univseral consensus" exits among experts that evil-rich-oil companies are ruining the world.
I'll stick with the MIT atomospheric prof.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220
http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=95000606
Mr. Lindzen is Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT.
Damn, been passing a bad link... these are good..
They ran out and saw the movie.
Didn't walk, didn't stroll, but ran...
Didn't walk, didn't stroll, but ran...
Quote from pattersb:
Again, they VOLUNTARILY ran out and saw the movie. That is hardly a random sample of atomospheric experts. They demonstrated a pre-disposition of supporting Gore's viewpoint by doing so.
If any of the 81/100 of reciepients that didn't respond thought Gore was a crackpot, tool, OR they feared the reprecussions of disagreeing with this "inconvenient truth" they would not have bothered answering or wasting their money on it.
Therefore, this MEANS NEXT TO NOTHING in the argument of whether a "univseral consensus" exits among experts that evil-rich-oil companies are ruining the world.
I'll stick with the MIT atomospheric prof.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220
http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=95000606
Mr. Lindzen is Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT.
Damn, been passing a bad link... these are good..
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
They ran out and saw the movie.
Didn't walk, didn't stroll, but ran...
That was a subtle point.
Gore's film was just recently released. I'd imagine it would take some time to collect opinions from 100 people ... I concluded that those who responded must have seen the movie the first week or two.
Who goes out to the first week or two of a new movie? Ever been to Star Wars on opening night? (You may have, I never have).
Considering the movie would present NO new evidence to an expert in the field, I place the odds very high they were true believers going in. Anyone with a differing view wouldn't waste their time.