Interesting snippet in Discover magazine. It has been what I also thought for awhile
Why not just burn biomass instead of trying to convert it to fuel???
<i>Searchinger says that the biomass currently tapped for biofuels would be put to better use making electricity. âThe process of converting biomass into liquid fuel uses half of the energy in the feedstock. Itâs far more efficient to burn the biomass for electricity and then use the electricity in cars.â That is in part because you waste less making the electricity and also because electric engines convert as much as 75 percent of available energy into forward motion, compared with the 20 percent energy conversion rate of gasoline engines.</i>
Why not just burn biomass instead of trying to convert it to fuel???
<i>Searchinger says that the biomass currently tapped for biofuels would be put to better use making electricity. âThe process of converting biomass into liquid fuel uses half of the energy in the feedstock. Itâs far more efficient to burn the biomass for electricity and then use the electricity in cars.â That is in part because you waste less making the electricity and also because electric engines convert as much as 75 percent of available energy into forward motion, compared with the 20 percent energy conversion rate of gasoline engines.</i>