Quote from spindr0:
I forgot to mention, why not just do the synthetic 75/85 call spread and save 1/2 the commissions, a pile of slippage and have a simplified combo order available for entry and exit?
A synthetic call involves Long Stock & Long Put, so I'll assume you meant Synthetic Long, Long Calls and short Puts. Using the 85 calls and the 75 put would be a Synthetic Long with split strikes.
Using the same prices this position would have a breakeven point of 88.13 compared to 82.62.
A net principal of ($3,130.00) and the naked puts have a margin requirement of $8,020.00 total initial outlay of $11,150.00, and the uncovered option requirement is marked-to-market daily , this requirement could increase significantly should the underlying move against the position. True the synthetic has unlimited upside but this includes a significant downside.
So, the Bull Spread Spread has limited risk, requires less capital and the underlying has to decline about 3 points to breakeven, if its unchanged, or up, maximum profit achieved.
The Synthetic while having unlimited profit potential also has significant downside risk. Requires greater capital, and requires the underlying to increase just to breakeven, requires a price of 90.50 to realize the same profit dollar wise, and a price of 91.61 to reap the same profit percentage wise (assuming the stock never declines and increases the capital requirement for naked margin).
There was no slippage, all orders are at the natural. The extra $35 in commissions generated from the other two legs is a bargain.