Spotted a BUG in an options article by Fidelity & CBOE from 2013 
This is the buggy article: "Long calendar spread with puts"
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-c...ions-strategy-guide/long-calendar-spread-puts
I wonder how such big companies can make such silly errors.
Moreover that in all the years since 2013 (9+ yrs!) nobody on Earth spotted this error!... except me...
Their disclaimer:
"Article copyright 2013 by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc (CBOE). Reprinted with permission from CBOE. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. Fidelity Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data."

The screenshot below is from the linked article.
The error is in the table: the row for Spot 100 is wrong, IMO, and maybe even some more is wrong in the article:

This is the buggy article: "Long calendar spread with puts"
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-c...ions-strategy-guide/long-calendar-spread-puts
I wonder how such big companies can make such silly errors.
Moreover that in all the years since 2013 (9+ yrs!) nobody on Earth spotted this error!... except me...

Their disclaimer:
"Article copyright 2013 by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc (CBOE). Reprinted with permission from CBOE. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. Fidelity Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data."

The screenshot below is from the linked article.
The error is in the table: the row for Spot 100 is wrong, IMO, and maybe even some more is wrong in the article:
Last edited: