Quote from zdreg:
if the software had been more "decent" microsoft would have made more money not less money.
Quote from Pekelo:
Let's play game! Let's suppose you are Bill Gates ca 1980 and you have 2 choices:
1. Do everything the same way as he did and became the richest man on Earth.
2. Make a more decent software so your costumers would actually love you, don't screw your competitors, keep a clean business practice, etc. You still be rich, but not as much as in #1.
After all, unless you want to buy a country or develope non-oil based transportation, or go to Mars, who really needs 42 billion???
Quote from jerryz:
the number 1 reason why the fabulously rich create their own charities is this
http://www.inc.com/resources/tax/articles/20051101/taxbreak.html
the number 2 reason is to further build relationships with government organizations. the charity contribution in this case is just a legal form of under the table payments in exchange for favors.
have you considered what actually happens to the money after a "donation" is made to a foreign country to help their poor? what happens to the money after the wire transfer reaches the destination? the poor will eventually get a few bottled water and t-shirts and some extra grub to eat, but where's the rest of the money?
if bill gates really wants to help people, there are plenty of ways of helping them directly. there are plenty of people and organizations who need help. you know the 1000 people who died yesterday because they couldn't afford surgery? maybe start there. whenever you see a charity that doesn't accept RFPs and has some wishy washy goal about helping people by collaborating with the government, count on 95% of it being bs.
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/ForGrantSeekers/OpenRFPs/
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/ForGrantSeekers/
Quote from thecalip:
I have no complaint on MSFT's software, it's only a small percentage of people are complaining.
Now. But in my game you started out in 1980. I have also no problem with XP, but that is what? like the 4-5th major version of the product, when they finally got it right.
He does more good than bad to the IT industry as a whole.
Ask the Netscape guys about that. But you seem to think that without Gates there wouldn't have been an IT revolution. He was not undispensible, somebody would have done/did similar things than what he did.
When I started using computer back in 94, computer was hard to operates.
Then you should know just how shitty his products were in the first 10-15 years. The only reason he got to be so rich because he succesfully killed the competition.
And that was my whole point about. Be charitable in your businesspractice first, and give away money later...