Buffet

Quote from harrytrader:

do you have parkinson illness ?

Parkinson's? Wow, for a French guy you sure are insensitive...

That is a conspiracy theory site...if you believe everything you read there, then it is you that have the problem. I know the French hate us for whatever reason, but you are letting that hatred cloud your judgement. Anyway, this is off-topic, so lets keep it about Buffett and his investment prowess, not rumors and Bush bashing. There are plenty of threads in Chit-Chat for you to get your kicks.
 
Quote from WarEagle:

$4 million on the coast of CA is hardly palatial these days. But I think BuffeTT's got it backwards...its Nebraska that seems to have a tax problem...$14k on a 500k residence? My wife if from Minnesota, land of 10,000 regulations and taxes, and there its not even half that.

=====
Interesting;
& with all due respect to that local tax collector that sounds like too liberal an appraisal.

Might appeal that one .:cool:
 
Quote from praetorian2:

Actually, the Laguna one is his wife's. They live apart, but for tax reasons are legally together. Supposedly, they're still close friends. For this reason, his name likely shows up on his wife's property. She has sold some of her BRK stock at times and used it to buy nicer things.

4m is not a palace either. C'mon, someone show me a real palacial estate(s).

+=======================================

Any have any details on that Bloomberg/TV news about Buffet buying silver this early am?Bloomberg tends to be accurate.

Like Buffets rural state & used cars help parts dealers, service centers.


No offence Praetorian2 but many people plus rural residents may consider $ 4 million home '' pretty high on the hog:cool: ''Prae got your silver question in here.



William O Neill has had some good points on gold [silver included] stocks in IBD plus IBD is wisely amoung tax cutting kings;
market still looks good longer term charts-$xau{Philly Gold & silver index}
 
That's an expensive place, no doubt. Just saying that it isn't a 50m kozlowski mansion.

I still got all my silver. I even added a bit on the most recent dip.

No idea on Buffett buying. I heard that he sold all his for a loss last year. Not sure why he'd rebuy so soon. That market is way too thin for someone like him to daytrade.
 
Quote from Trader5287:

VN has a great website imo. He does not post results as far as I know but he does call the SnP every few days. He's never been anything other than forthright about his blowouts in the Baht and SnP in everything he's written.
And note that when he recently received a multi-million dollar settlement from the CME, he turned all the money over to his original investors. (See here for details.)
 
Quote from praetorian2:

Where's my goddamn palace....!!!



(lol). I just do not think it exists.


me first, p2 ! LOL ! i am still trying to locate the article about buffets palatial estates--- if i can't , i'll concede.

surfer :)
 
Quote from praetorian2:

Surf- Time for a concession speech?


Just so you know, I'm just yanking your chain. You're the man. (Even if Buffett is a normal guy).


LOL ! not quite yet, i am still looking for the info.


how was NYC ?


surfer :)
 
The first post on this thread states that this thread belongs in Econ and not Trading. I respectfully disagree. Buffett is certainly not an economist and he certainly is a trader.

a. Despite popular opinion, Buffett does not buy and hold. Historical examples include Disney and McDonalds, both companies he bought and sold several times. More recently, his holdings in LVLT and AMZN were more trades rather than buy and hold decisions. The idea that his "holding period is forever" is just bullshit intended to keep people from frontrunning the $50B that he has to slosh around.

b. The notion that Berkshire is a big value equity mutual fund is also incorrect. Until last year, for the three years prior, Buffett had at least 50% of his holdings or more in bonds.

c. Silver. From what I hear, he did sell his silver holdings. Not sure if he sold at a loss though.

d. Derivatives. Buffett says he hates the use of derivatives. More recently, the FASB (who agrees with Buffett) requires the disclosure of complex derivs on the balance sheet. Who did this screw the most? Why, Berkshire Hathaway, because of their little-known investment in hedge fund West End Capital, now has to disclose over $20B in derivatives (off of a $500M investment) on their balance sheet.

e. Note that West End Capital is run by John Byrne's son (Byrne has run insurance companies for Buffett in the past). Buffett's attempt to make this an off balance sheet transaction to a related party (think Enron) did not work out too well.

f. Back to the trading question: Buffett is also well-known for arbitrage short-term trading strategies. In fact, probably half the profits of his hedge fund (1957 - 1969) came from arbitrage.

All of this said, there is no arguing that Buffett has built a good company and has a great and enviable track record. I am actually more disgusted with his supposed emulators and the media adulation than the man himself. I've been to the Berkshire Hathaway annual meetings, I've listened to the critics, and I'm currently contracted to write a book on "Buffett and trading" and I think there's a lot to be learned from studying the approaches he's used particularly in the past few years in distressed trading, convert arb, silver, currencies, etc.
 
Back
Top