Quote from shortie:
in 43 years Berkshire Hathaway had ONLY ONE negative year -6% in 2001. YTD it is -36%.
i think it is gonna have +30% run-up before year end.
Quote from jeb9999:
Where did you get that total nonsense from?
Here is the correct data for multiple down years for BRKA stock:
1999 from 70,000 to 56,100 down 20%
1990 from 8675 to 6625 down 24%
1984 down 3%
1975 down 5%
1974 down 44%
1973 down 11%
1970 down 7%
1966 down 8%
Quote from Daal:
he confused book value growth with the stock performance. in 73 74 buffett stock tanked because the market thought his portfolio was worth less yet GAAP made him have a 'winning' year
Quote from jeb9999:
Who the heck buys and sells stocks by looking at "book value growth"?
Only liquidators care about book value. And they only care about the real book value, not the stated book value.
Quote from Daal:
he confused book value growth with the stock performance. in 73 74 buffett stock tanked because the market thought his portfolio was worth less yet GAAP made him have a 'winning' year
Quote from gbos:
His stock tanked then because market thought they are going to buy it cheaper later. Prices always are more volatile than fundamentals. GAAP made him have a winning year? Do you think itâs possible to make it from an initial 10 thousand dollar investment to 60 billion using GAAP to fool people for 5 decades? Why then, not everybody is doing it? Donât they have a motive to make it to forbes 400?
Quote from riskfreetrading:
You seem to have a mind enslaved by the Jewish people. All three are Jews. You call them the smarest guys, when you have the evidence that they are not. And what proof you have that they are not the dumbest guys in the room?
The smarest guys in the room are other people. RFT is leading them!
![]()
Quote from short&naked:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/opinion/17buffett.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=buffett&st=cse
He basically says that it has gone up before in the face of so much turmoil (including WWII) so it will continue to do so in the future. First, this is a classic case of the fallacy of historical inevitability. Second, WWII is what actually caused the bull market in the 1950.
Is the Oracle getting a bit senile?