It looks to me the judge focused too much on the fact that the banned husband more or less signed up again on disguise.
But what about this "broker"? Isn't this just an unregulated and unsupervised gambling den operating faulty roulette wheels and loaded dice (they themselves more or less admitted to that)? If so, did they ever bother to refund customers who LOST with the faulty wheel? If not, I do not understand the judge allowing them to avoid paying a winner once her wager was accepted.
I know that's problem. This broker is actually the largest broker in the forex industry. What it does is widely accepted in all countries that it operates in under all regulations as long as they disclose it and they do disclose it in their legal disclosure document, the stop-hunting and the delay quoting part. So it's like the casino letting you know that the game is rigged in favour of the dealer. But if you go with a scheme and win against of the casino, they don't let you keep your winnings. This is basically what happens with all of those market maker aka casino brokers in the forex industry. So instead of taking you to a room with no cameras and rough you up with all those creative tortures, they just forfeit your winnings.