I don’t do infowars.
Pardon? If the link to info is "Infowars", you disregard it?
I don’t do infowars.
Pardon? If the link to info is "Infowars", you disregard it?
I can't speak for gwb, but I certainly am a lot more skeptical of stuff coming from infowars. And I don't go to that website unless someone else is linking to it.
It should be difficult to amend the Constitution. However, it is not impossible. We have amended it 27 times.
Here’s the kicker, often when the will of the people cannot make a change to the constitution because of the difficulties of the amendment process, we forfeit that power to the courts. Think about that.
.
I think what you are saying is that when there is not sufficient will among the people to amend the constitution, liberal courts will usurp that power.
Just as the Founders intended!
GWB's disdain for the Constitution is a major reason why he makes my "Worst US Presidents" list.
I know, you've said that before. I've thought you might be "shooting the messenger".
I find Alex to be a bit annoying and histrionic myself, but I don't have any suspicions of "fake news" on that site. (BTW... I searched this story on the net and after seeing it on at least a dozen other sites, I stopped looking.)
I'm not saying infowars doesn't have accurate news stories. I'm just saying that I've seen stories on there - more than other conservative sites - where the stories seem to be more based on conjecture than actual reporting.