Bright Trading's new payout model

Status
Not open for further replies.
never said MM's should be obliged to be waiters or eat up a collapse. but yes, they will provide liquidity as long as they can make money.

Quote from propseeker:


market makers behaved as they always have: provide liquidity until they're stuffed to the gills, and then step away. this will never change. you can't regulate someone to go bankrupt just so some idiot can dump his wad on you. that's not how markets work.
 
Before I share that information, I need to check with the firm to ensure that it's o.k. to disclose that information about them.

Walt

Quote from Don Bright:

Some firms can enter "mid-price" type orders, but most that I know of, cannot enter straight sub-pennies. If you know of one or two, please PM me, I would like to discuss it with them, thanks.

Don
 
Quote from lescor:

Can you name some prop firms that allow entering sub-penny orders?

In my experience sub-penny trades are one of three things:

1. Broker internalization
2. Dark pool trades
3. Specific types of order sent to certain ECNs/exchanges that sometimes execute at partial penny increments.

Normal prop firms can't access broker internalization pools. Granted, this is where a lot of the partial penny trades happen.

Hopefully most prop firms have access to at least a couple sources of dark liquidity. If you can't route directly to a pool, you should still be able to hit SOME dark stock through specific types of orders through the public ECNs.

Most of the major exchanges and ECNs allow for orders that can execute in between the spread. Some partial penny prints are these types of orders.
 
centralized auction system was different. and far superior vs. this quasi otc fragmentation imho.

Quote from propseeker:

liquidity exists because people have an incentive to provide it (profits).

take away that incentive and force them to make a market at any cost 'for the greater good', and you no longer have a market.

think about it for a second. you can't force altruism in place of basic personal survival and expect that system to work for even a small amount of time. state mandated suicide, regardless of how wonderful it might sound, is just not sustainable.
 
again, i never said a market maker should be a cashier at mcdonalds. however, stock prices should be based on true supply and demand. not fragmented liquidity across 80 darkpools whenever the MM programs feel like providing liquidity.

Quote from propseeker:

liquidity exists because people have an incentive to provide it (profits).

take away that incentive and force them to make a market at any cost 'for the greater good', and you no longer have a market.

think about it for a second. you can't force altruism in place of basic personal survival and expect that system to work for even a small amount of time. state mandated suicide, regardless of how wonderful it might sound, is just not sustainable.
 
Quote from Lights:

again, i never said a market maker should be a cashier at mcdonalds. however, stock prices should be based on true supply and demand. not fragmented liquidity across 80 darkpools whenever the MM programs feel like providing liquidity.

Why don't prop traders provide liquidity? Every time the SEC tries to come down on prop traders, they always cry "don't hurt us, we provide liquidity to the market."
 
that's the current politically correct excuse to give. they all say that. "we provide value to the markets".


Quote from Maverick74:

Why don't prop traders provide liquidity? Every time the SEC tries to come down on prop traders, they always cry "don't hurt us, we provide liquidity to the market."
 
btw, what's the difference between a market maker and prop trading? goldman still has it's billions of dollar market making biz but shed it's "prop".

people are rewriting the dictionary.
 
Quote from Lights:

btw, what's the difference between a market maker and prop trading? goldman still has it's billions of dollar market making biz but shed it's "prop".

people are rewriting the dictionary.

gs didn't shed it's prop, it shifted it to offshore hedge funds they're seeding to their existing traders. no way in hell gs is giving up it's golden goose.
 
Quote from Lights:

that's the current politically correct excuse to give. they all say that. "we provide value to the markets".

Right I know that, but when the HFT algos pull away from the market, what is stopping Don and Bob Bright from stepping in and providing liquidity? Or ECho Trade or whoever. Or some daytrader at IB. Why does it have to be Getco or Traderworks? Isn't this the pot calling the kettle black?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top