Quote from Szeven:
Would you trade for 5 years full time and make 0 or less than 0? Would anyone?
I think silly arguments like this just hurt the credible arguments of others on this thread.
It's actually more than you'd think. I find it odd myself, but I know a few group leaders who have had guys trading under them for several years without making any real money (not Bright traders mind you, I just mean in general).
I think the main point of his statement was "intraday". It seems Bright's costs are must more palatable for traders who take overnights and don't trade as actively. That's when most of their "benefits" can make a difference. For guys who don't need those extras, the higher commission costs just don't make sense.
Financial stability is obviously important, but at what cost? Eric said he's saved over $1MM over the last 18 months at his firm vs. Bright, so even if he had $500K in his account with a "shady" prop firm, it went out of business and he got $0 back (not likely, but just for argument's sake), he's still up over $500K. Obviously most traders don't put up the numbers he does, but everyone needs to weigh all factors for themselves. For some people, Bright makes a lot of sense obviously, and for others, it's not even a reasonable option because of the commissions. Don himself has said this over and over.
