Quote from DeepSky:
BLUEX is a weak trader. He needs to be let go. I feel bad for all the new subscribers that are not aware of his poor performance and actually follow his calls. I know I was burnt early on by his poor timing and poor selections. (If you take the opposite side of BLUEX's calls than you would make money)
Scalp, Chart and Contx make BriefingTrader worth the money. Scalp is awesome in this environment! If it were not for these traders than I believe no one would subscribe for more than 3 months as they would likely be upside down in their PnL.
I would not follow these trader's calls (fundx, betax) as they are around the 45 -55% win rate. So its like gambling with these guys.
Its too bad that Trader doesn't get rid of the poor performers to make way for better traders like that of Scalp Chart and ContX caliber.
Hi DeepSky,
Very important point in there.
First off, thanks for the kudos (I'm Chart). But got a question for you...(reason I popped in on this thread was to find some unbiased feedback.)
We can safely assume two things about all traders: Traders get hot and cold for endogenous reasons, and traders perform differently in different environments.
(For example, I would say that SCALP, CONTX, and I are somewhat more intuitive/tape-reader types, ie less mechanical than the others you mentioned. And that's working bigtime lately as the setups that made money over the last few years are all traps right now, and so the trade you have to put on is to sense where those traps are, and whether or not they're crowded, and if so, ride the unwind move the opposite wayâ¦And less mechanical/more intuitive traders are going to make that transition sooner.)
But there's nothing we can really do as a service to avoid that variability. We could constantly change our staff on a weekly basis, but that would just be trading the traders. And trading itself is hard enough.
So, your always going to have a spread between traders when comparing performance, and that spread will vary and flip across time (and, believe me, I've seen BLUEX, BETAX, and FUNDX go on absolute world-beating tears, to the point where you would completely have reversed your groupings in your post).
And, for what it's worth, I think this variability/disparity is probably exaggerated right now given all the 'unprecedented' market behavior going on, as I'm sure you'd agree.
But, and hereâs the point, a key supposition we hold is that subscribers can probably tell (as I think you have maybe demonstrated in your post), based on trends in performance and the amount of conviction we convey in our 'presence' on the site, which traders to leverage up on, and which to ignore. Not right away, and not all the time, but over the broad sample, the volume should shift to the hot traders.
My question is: do you find that you can tell, and profit from that judgement? Or is it entirely in retrospect?
And this goes for anyone who reads this and has an answer.
Many thanks,
Brett