N niko Nov 12, 2013 #441 Quote from dbphoenix: 0430 demand line has been broken decisively. 0818: and a retracement More... 4:30 in NM is kind of early! Or you just moved to Europe?
Quote from dbphoenix: 0430 demand line has been broken decisively. 0818: and a retracement More... 4:30 in NM is kind of early! Or you just moved to Europe?
dbphoenix Nov 12, 2013 #442 Hey. Early birds catch worms. But I was referring to the demand line that began at 0430.
N niko Nov 12, 2013 #443 Quote from dbphoenix: Hey. Early birds catch worms. But I was referring to the demand line that began at 0430. More... Hehehe, I was looking for the 0430 break and couldn´t find it. Lets see if we can get some worms.
Quote from dbphoenix: Hey. Early birds catch worms. But I was referring to the demand line that began at 0430. More... Hehehe, I was looking for the 0430 break and couldn´t find it. Lets see if we can get some worms.
N niko Nov 12, 2013 #444 Anyway, regarding that, If I had been at the screen at 7:50 my focus would have been on the DL that started at 6:55. Do you factor in those farther away lines in the line+ret analysis? Or were you looking at an interval longer than 1 min.
Anyway, regarding that, If I had been at the screen at 7:50 my focus would have been on the DL that started at 6:55. Do you factor in those farther away lines in the line+ret analysis? Or were you looking at an interval longer than 1 min.
dbphoenix Nov 12, 2013 #445 Quote from niko: Anyway, regarding that, If I had been at the screen at 7:50 my focus would have been on the DL that started at 6:55. Do you factor in those farther away lines in the line+ret analysis? Or were you looking at an interval longer than 1 min. More... Given that the move that peaked at 0630 went nowhere, I looked at a "longer-term" demand line. But that's just a tactical preference.
Quote from niko: Anyway, regarding that, If I had been at the screen at 7:50 my focus would have been on the DL that started at 6:55. Do you factor in those farther away lines in the line+ret analysis? Or were you looking at an interval longer than 1 min. More... Given that the move that peaked at 0630 went nowhere, I looked at a "longer-term" demand line. But that's just a tactical preference.
dbphoenix Nov 12, 2013 #446 0843: This long pretty much has to be taken, but I suspect it will be stopped out quickly. 0851: Out. Chop.
0843: This long pretty much has to be taken, but I suspect it will be stopped out quickly. 0851: Out. Chop.
N niko Nov 12, 2013 #447 Quote from dbphoenix: Given that the move that peaked at 0630 went nowhere, I looked at a "longer-term" demand line. But that's just a tactical preference. More... Thanks!
Quote from dbphoenix: Given that the move that peaked at 0630 went nowhere, I looked at a "longer-term" demand line. But that's just a tactical preference. More... Thanks!
N niko Nov 12, 2013 #448 We are on somewhat of a TR, DL from 9:00 Still valid, but we are at the top of the TR at 47.
T timokrates Nov 12, 2013 #449 Quote from dbphoenix: 0843: This long pretty much has to be taken, but I suspect it will be stopped out quickly. 0851: Out. Chop. More... 0914: RET Entry leaving the chop?
Quote from dbphoenix: 0843: This long pretty much has to be taken, but I suspect it will be stopped out quickly. 0851: Out. Chop. More... 0914: RET Entry leaving the chop?
N niko Nov 12, 2013 #450 Quote from timokrates: 0914: RET Entry leaving the chop? More... If you look at the chart from the 8:43 perspective, you really had a RET after a parabolic fall, there was no chop just yet, but it did look suspicious.
Quote from timokrates: 0914: RET Entry leaving the chop? More... If you look at the chart from the 8:43 perspective, you really had a RET after a parabolic fall, there was no chop just yet, but it did look suspicious.
