I don't argue with facts. I argue with OPINIONS. And that is why i am arguing with you...you only state your opinions (e.g thousands of london jobs will be moved to xyz), there are no facts being expressed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
BREXIT
- Thread starter oldnemesis
- Start date
I don't argue with facts. I argue with OPINIONS. And that is why i am arguing with you...you only state your opinions (e.g thousands of london jobs will be moved to xyz), there are no facts being expressed.
...because there are not enough qualified people in the UK to do the job? And on the lower end because there is no one willing to do the work at competitive prices? And sure you can leave. But if you bickered from the beginning and never came with constructive criticism but always complained then I say, go to hell and get the fuxx out. Listen, when desk subordinates came with problems or they ask for advice regarding certain risks I always demanded they come with ideas and possible solutions. I don't accept those who just complain or come empty handed. Those people are a drag on the business over time. That is how the rest of Europe thinks of the UK at the moment. At least the vast majority. Bullying others for years one should not wonder to not be loved, and even being disadvantaged when it comes to pay back time. It's really that simple.
If you cannot see why big business ad the banks wanted UK to remain then you are Stevie Wonder.
Yes I do in the literal sense. Any larger trade gets passed through the system and any interbank dealer will know about it very soon after. I and any other serious trader knows which structures were traded on any given day especially those in size.
that's right I forgot you have access to the order flow of central banks. douche.
...because there are not enough qualified people in the UK to do the job?
hahahaha. banks will do whatever is necessary to bring in suitable people regardless.
And on the lower end because there is no one willing to do the work at competitive prices?
the cheaper low end labour is a token saving for them.
It's clear you don't actually know the main reason why the banks wanted a 'remain' vote. I am not going to spell it out for you.
Yes I do in the literal sense. Any larger trade gets passed through the system and any interbank dealer will know about it very soon after. I and any other serious trader knows which structures were traded on any given day especially those in size.
I would literally rub myself with fish guts and jump in a shark tank if you had just one iota of valuable order flow in your possession. First you try the 'UK should have stayed because it knew what is was signing up to in 1973' crap, now you are trying to pull the 'i have central bank order flow' horseshit. Thanks for giving us all a good laugh before the weekend. bisous.
Incorrect. Banks first and foremost care about keeping their regulators happy. Because without license it's game over. With bad people on the other hand you can still run an outfit, albeit a shitty one.
hahahaha. banks will do whatever is necessary to bring in suitable people regardless.
the cheaper low end labour is a token saving for them.
It's clear you don't actually know the main reason why the banks wanted a 'remain' vote. I am not going to spell it out for you.
You are just a little upset boy by now realizing that you were mislead in your vote about the true cost in the same way than many others who wished now they had not voted to leave.
I simply disproved your claim that the UK did not know what it signed up for when it joined the EU. That's a blatant lie. It did know where the train was heading to, which was way beyond a pure trade union.
Listen I have nothing against you personally (aside believing your line of argument is idiotic). I don't even mind the UK leaving the EU. What millions in the EU do mind, however, is that the UK has held the EU hostage in order to gain special treatment and concessions for decades. Truth of the matter is you are not any more special that France or Germany or Poland. Not one inch more special. And now as you left you again hold everyone hostage. Like signing and filling out a divorce paper and waving it constantly in front of your spouse and threatening to file it if your spouse does not do this or that. At some point your spouse will say "make up your mind, shit head, but I don't take your bully crap anymore".
And I never said the UK should have stayed if you wanted to leave. I said the UK should have never joined a union who was clear from the start that it wants to be more than a trade union. It's simply idiotic to join something you claim you hate.
I simply disproved your claim that the UK did not know what it signed up for when it joined the EU. That's a blatant lie. It did know where the train was heading to, which was way beyond a pure trade union.
Listen I have nothing against you personally (aside believing your line of argument is idiotic). I don't even mind the UK leaving the EU. What millions in the EU do mind, however, is that the UK has held the EU hostage in order to gain special treatment and concessions for decades. Truth of the matter is you are not any more special that France or Germany or Poland. Not one inch more special. And now as you left you again hold everyone hostage. Like signing and filling out a divorce paper and waving it constantly in front of your spouse and threatening to file it if your spouse does not do this or that. At some point your spouse will say "make up your mind, shit head, but I don't take your bully crap anymore".
And I never said the UK should have stayed if you wanted to leave. I said the UK should have never joined a union who was clear from the start that it wants to be more than a trade union. It's simply idiotic to join something you claim you hate.
I would literally rub myself with fish guts and jump in a shark tank if you had just one iota of valuable order flow in your possession. First you try the 'UK should have stayed because it knew what is was signing up to in 1973' crap, now you are trying to pull the 'i have central bank order flow' horseshit. Thanks for giving us all a good laugh before the weekend. bisous.
Incorrect. Banks first and foremost care about keeping their regulators happy. Because without license it's game over. With bad people on the other hand you can still run an outfit, albeit a shitty one.
Yep, further confirmation you have no clue about the true reason the banks wanted remain. Ask yourself a question, when was the last time a regulator took away the license of the one of the top tier investment banks?
Banks first and foremost care about making profits and they are very good at it.
Mate, I mentioned the loss of passporting rights in a very early post of mine in this thread.
Then with euro clearing moving to Europe should UK exit the EU most trading in euro denominated assets and derivatives will follow.
Can you get real for just a moment and be honest?
http://internal.uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKKCN0ZE1YL
Then with euro clearing moving to Europe should UK exit the EU most trading in euro denominated assets and derivatives will follow.
Can you get real for just a moment and be honest?
http://internal.uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKKCN0ZE1YL
Yep, further confirmation you have no clue about the true reason the banks wanted remain. Ask yourself a question, when was the last time a regulator took away the license of the one of the top tier investment banks?
Banks first and foremost care about making profits and they are very good at it.