BREAKING: WSJ Reports White House Found No Corroboration of Allegations Against Kavanaugh
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
It becomes a ridiculous headline when the word "Found" is omitted. As is, it is accurate. Not because there is no corroboration; but because there was no corroboration "Found". Intentionally not seeking corroboration does not eliminate it; it makes it irrelevant in the current context of the Kavanaugh confirmation process by making lies believable.Color me "shocked," lol, one of the most ridiculous headlines ever.....
https://www.mediaite.com/online/bre...rroboration-of-allegations-against-kavanaugh/
The funniest part is thst liberals will still proclaim hes a "rapist"
Last edited:
Whatever. You still think Trump and the Russians conspired against Hillary despite your own guy having not found anything on Trump, so there's no talking common sense to you.
Witness tampering:
“Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired (FBI) agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement.” https://www.wsj.com/articles/friend-of-dr-ford-felt-pressure-to-revisit-statement-1538715152
“Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired (FBI) agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement.” https://www.wsj.com/articles/friend-of-dr-ford-felt-pressure-to-revisit-statement-1538715152
Are you thinking of Mueller here? If so, it might be better to wait for his report before drawing a conclusion. I am not OK with Tax Fraud and Money Laundering regardless of whether it involves Russians or not. And I am not OK with a pathological liar as President. I view anyone who is aware of Trumps major violations of our laws, his constant lying and persistent dishonesty and exaggeration, and still finds him acceptable as their president, as rather weak minded.
In my opinion the Russian interest was in trying to get Trump elected. I don't think harming Ms Clinton was an objective, that was just a side-effect, a happy one from the Russian viewpoint. They knew they had enough information on Trump because of all his money laundering activities for Russians and his Russian sourcing of investment funds that he would be vulnerable to pressure from the Kremlin. When Trump announced he would run for president, a golden opportunity fell into their laps. Their goal was to get rid of the Magnitsky Act or at the least achieve lax enforcement. Clearly, they also wanted to see the sanctions on Russia lifted, and that of course is what Flynn's communications before the election were about. (Kushner perhaps also was involved, though that remains to be seen.) It seems the Russians have had mixed results from their efforts so far.
So then why were you so supportive of Mueller wasting taxpayer dollars if you don't think Trump was complicit?
But you are OK with all of those things if it is a democrat doing them.