BREAKING: WSJ Reports White House Found No Corroboration of Allegations Against Kavanaugh

[Sprout]

I have not seen or heard anything about the FBI report but if the report stipulates that Dr. Ford's statement cannot be verified since there is no corroboration on the allegations against Kavanaugh then Judge Kavanaugh absolutely deserves to get his confirmation vote as soon as possible and as it was agreed upon by both Democrats and Republicans in Senate judiciary committee last Friday.

That is how a civil society functions. No If's and no But's.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1047595847549145088

 

[Snarkhund]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1047595847549145088

Richard Blumenthal lied about his military service. A loathesome creature.

 

[Cuddles]

We are passed the "what ifs". Then Democrats should have done a better job defining the terms and parameters of the investigation.

I personally can't stand the guy. I think he was the worst SCOTUS nominee that I have seen in recent years. Many better conservative judges are out there.

One current and two former FBI officials confirmed to NBC News that dozens of witnesses have come forward to FBI field offices who say they have information on Brett Kavanaugh, but agents have not been permitted to talk to many of them.

There could be a crucial reason for their omission from the investigation. Sources have told Bloomberg that the FBI has not done interviews with Ford or Kavanaugh because the White House hasn’t granted it the authority to conduct them. A source has also told NBC Newsthat the White House felt that the testimony Ford offered under oath last week was sufficient.

 

[Sprout]

Richard Blumenthal lied about his military service. A loathesome creature.

Didn’t know. Thanks for pointing it out. In his defensive he did acknowledge and apologize for stolen valor.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/richard-blumenthal-vietnam/

Still doesn’t invalidate the content of investigation 101; interview both accuser and accused.

 

[Cuddles]

Richard Blumenthal lied about his military service. A loathesome creature.

Trump lies on a daily basis and lied to get out of service, yet your ilk clenches to his balls and falsehoods for dear life.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

I suspect Kavanaugh confirmation Fri or Sat

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Didn’t know. Thanks for pointing it out. In his defensive he did acknowledge and apologize for stolen valor.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/richard-blumenthal-vietnam/

Still doesn’t invalidate the content of investigation 101; interview both accuser and accused.

What kind of conciliation is this??? Bogus?????

 

[LacesOut]

Didn’t know. Thanks for pointing it out. In his defensive he did acknowledge and apologize for stolen valor.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/richard-blumenthal-vietnam/

Still doesn’t invalidate the content of investigation 101; interview both accuser and accused.

Must not have mattered much to the Dems. They sat on Dr Fraud’s bullshit letter for 6 weeks.
Both Fraud and Kav were questioned vigorously by the Senate Judiciary.
What conclusion do you think could have been reached by interviewing them again? This is not, nor ever was, a case for the FBI.

 

[UsualName]

First of all, I am using the same tone that you are using with me. I even used some of your phrasing. You are the one who is getting angry and saying "dumb shit" (your words).

Second, you are contradicting yourself. This is your quote that I responded to. You said yourself, that Kavanaugh did not get due process (highlighted in blue). You are accusing me of the very same thing you did -- confusing due process and due diligence. Read the second sentence (in bold) out loud. It is not coherent and appears to be a feeble attempt to insult me.

Kavanaugh did not get due process because there is not due process in congressional hearings. Get it?

And another thing, Thomas is guilty of sexual harassment against Anita Hill. This is known and would have held up his nomination had the senate done due diligence.

 

[gwb-trading]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1047595847549145088

Interviewing the accused and the accuser for supporting evidence to an event is NOT Investigation 101. In fact it is what you should NOT do when investigating claims when both parties have already given statements. You don't re-interview them so they can change their "memory" or timeline. Blumenthal is an idiot.