FBI background checks only rely on direct witnesses when investigating events placed in a background check file.
I’m not sure about that but I am aware that background checks mostly consist of 302s.
FBI background checks only rely on direct witnesses when investigating events placed in a background check file.
Those allegations are not the source of contention, Blasey-Ford is. I’m not sure if Fox News is focused on the allegations at the margins but I assume that is why you keep bringing them up.

Those allegations are not the source of contention, Blasey-Ford is. I’m not sure if Fox News is focused on the allegations at the margins but I assume that is why you keep bringing them up.
I’m not sure about that but I am aware that background checks mostly consist of 302s.
Yes or no...... will you change your mind if/when the FBI comes back with nothing?
Or is an accusation enough to ruin a persons life... cause if thats the new standard, i cant wait till the next election...... "I got alot of problems with you people"
For events being investigated - 302's are only accepted from people "proclaimed" to be potential direct witnesses of the event.
It is very different than interviewing friends, co-workers, and acquaintances of the subject for generic background material.
The Senate Democrats asked for specific events to be investigated. The FBI is properly investigating the specific events per normal guidelines -- which limits the interviews to potential eye-witnesses and excludes hearsay.
This is why no amount of evidence, investigations, arguments, or logic will ever appeal to someone who simply refuses to accept that the investigation isn't about proving innocence or guilt, but scoring a point for their "side".