BREAKING: WSJ Reports White House Found No Corroboration of Allegations Against Kavanaugh

Internally, the bureau is concerned that the constraints of the investigation could damage its reputation for finding the truth, the officials said.

More than 20 individuals who know either Kavanaugh or Ramirez, who has accused the nominee of exposing himself to her while the two attended Yale University, have not heard from the FBI despite attempts to contact investigators, including Kavanaugh’s roommate at the time and a former close Ramirez friend.

A senior U.S. official and two other sources briefed on the details of the FBI investigation confirmed to NBC news that the FBI’s work on the Brett Kavanaugh matter remains significantly limited in scope, and that it’s unlikely agents will be allowed to interview many, if any, additional witnesses before the probe wraps up this week.

One current and two former FBI officials confirmed to NBC News that dozens of witnesses have come forward to FBI field offices who say they have information on Brett Kavanaugh, but agents have not been permitted to talk to many of them. To the extent that any interviews have been done, the officials say, it’s not clear the information will be considered as part of the FBI’s limited scope inquiry.


Yes or no..... when the FBI comes back with nothing will you accept their conclusion?
 
Did any of those people witness the events? No - is the answer. The FBI will only interview witnesses to the event - not anyone else. The same is true for every investigation or background check.

These folks don't care whether the investigation was performed properly. They don't care that anyone was supposedly raped, and they certainly don't actually care for Ford or anyone else. The only thing that matters to them is that a conservative judge not be confirmed to the SCOTUS. Apart from that, the rest of this is a side show. It's important to remember that. This is why no amount of evidence, investigations, arguments, or logic will ever appeal to someone who simply refuses to accept that the investigation isn't about proving innocence or guilt, but scoring a point for their "side".
 
These folks don't care whether the investigation was performed properly. They don't care that anyone was supposedly raped, and they certainly don't actually care for Ford or anyone else. The only thing that matters to them is that a conservative judge not be confirmed to the SCOTUS. Apart from that, the rest of this is a side show. It's important to remember that. This is why no amount of evidence, investigations, arguments, or logic will ever appeal to someone who simply refuses to accept that the investigation isn't about proving innocence or guilt, but scoring a point for their "side".


Exactly! Dems are pissed off about Merick Garland, so they are willing to do anything in order to destroy kavanaugh....... This is seriously sick shit, and Feinstiein herself even knew it, thats why she didnt let this happen till the 13th hour.
 
Internally, the bureau is concerned that the constraints of the investigation could damage its reputation for finding the truth, the officials said.

More than 20 individuals who know either Kavanaugh or Ramirez, who has accused the nominee of exposing himself to her while the two attended Yale University, have not heard from the FBI despite attempts to contact investigators, including Kavanaugh’s roommate at the time and a former close Ramirez friend.

A senior U.S. official and two other sources briefed on the details of the FBI investigation confirmed to NBC news that the FBI’s work on the Brett Kavanaugh matter remains significantly limited in scope, and that it’s unlikely agents will be allowed to interview many, if any, additional witnesses before the probe wraps up this week.

One current and two former FBI officials confirmed to NBC News that dozens of witnesses have come forward to FBI field offices who say they have information on Brett Kavanaugh, but agents have not been permitted to talk to many of them. To the extent that any interviews have been done, the officials say, it’s not clear the information will be considered as part of the FBI’s limited scope inquiry.




Maybe the FBI is doing an HQ SPECIAL here.

Howz that workin out for ya?
 
Did any of those people witness the events? No - is the answer. The FBI will only interview witnesses to the event - not anyone else. The same is true for every investigation or background check.

Source for your claim?
 
Earlier in the week, NBC was willing to roll with a story that was "Hearsay based on Hearsay" They actually printed a story from an anonymous source, who claimed they saw someone else claiming to be victimised.......

Any rational person can now see this for the fucking circus show it has become.
"Rational" being the operative word. Rationality is in very short supply on the left side of the isle these days.
 
Did any of those people witness the events? No - is the answer. The FBI will only interview witnesses to the event - not anyone else. The same is true for every investigation or background check.

This is wrong. Sexual harassment and assault commonly does not have direct witnesses. These investigations often rely on timelines and third party accounts.
 
Back
Top