BREAKING NEWS: Karl Rove Indicted!!!

LOL, typical. Lost the argument on his statement that it wasn't widespread, so now has to change the subject. Guess that's as good an admission as Z can dish out. Sucks to be wrong, tho.

Meanwhile, the WSJ has some interesting info about the very widespread liberal hysteria:

On Saturday night, attorney Robert Luskin was trying to barbecue at his Washington home when the phone started ringing nonstop. A story posted on an Internet site Truthout.org reported that his client, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, had been indicted.

Mr. Luskin says he issued an explicit denial to anyone who contacted him. But the story set off a fire storm, with reporters from newspapers, television and elsewhere seeking to check its veracity, and Web log writers seeking comment.
More...
http://online.wsj.com/public/articl...lza7zwnpRE_20060614.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top
 
I hate to get in a pissing match with a moderator, especially one who appears to be so bloody full of piss, but the argument is that there was no widespread hysteria.

Perhaps you don't understand the proper use of the term hysteria.....

It is no surprise that you are claiming to have won some argument though....

Now, let's see TGregg email all the ET party regulars to turn this into a full scale flame war....just the kind of thing that I am sure Baron and Joe love to moderate....






Quote from TGregg:

LOL, typical. Lost the argument on his statement that it wasn't widespread, so now has to change the subject. Guess that's as good an admission as Z can dish out. Sucks to be wrong, tho.

Meanwhile, the WSJ has some interesting info about the widespread liberal hysteria:


http://online.wsj.com/public/articl...lza7zwnpRE_20060614.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top
More...
 
It was not widespread hysteria.

Do you really need me to post the definition of hysteria?

:confused:

Let's do another Google Search.

Try typing Democratic spin, then Republican spin....

Try typing in Democrat slander, then Republican slander....

Try typing in Democrat bullshit, then Republican bullshit...




Quote from TGregg:

Here you go folks, go read it yourself:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1073722#post1073722

Z clearly makes the claim that it really is not widespread, but when the evidence is in, well he really meant something else. :D :D :D
More...
 
They (Karl Rove and company) were good at spinning nothing into something, but middle America has finally caught up with the rest of us and they ain't buying it anymore.

Additionally, IMHO, it seems like the right wingers are trying to through all sorts of stuff against the wall (to see what sticks) to try to divert the public's attention from the upcoming indictment.
 
I wouldn't bother with Tgregg, he's from the South. I notice if you post anything bad about Bush economic wise in the economic forum, it ends up in chit chat or is deleted. lol.
 
Up till T. Gregg, I thought a moderator's job was to moderate. Imagine Rush Limbaugh moderating the presidential debates. Keep up the good work T. You're doing a hell of a job.
 
Quote from hoodooman:

Up till T. Gregg, I thought a moderator's job was to moderate. Imagine Rush Limbaugh moderating the presidential debates. Keep up the good work T. You're doing a hell of a job.
More...

Both are idiots.

And most likely drug users.
 
Quote from K-Rock:

Additionally, IMHO, it seems like the right wingers are trying to through all sorts of stuff against the wall (to see what sticks) to try to divert the public's attention from the upcoming indictment.
More...

Seeing as how there is no indictment, it's really hysterical liberals making stuff up to divert the public's attention.
 
It could just as easily be pointed out that your reaction to the bolg where someone thought Rove had been indicted is one of conservative hysteria.....

Quote from TGregg:

Seeing as how there is no indictment, it's really hysterical liberals making stuff up to divert the public's attention.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top