Quote from 377OHMS:
I say Ron Paul is a kook. Or alternatively he could be called an islamofascist apologist and hopelessly ignorant isolationist without the first clue as to how to run an economy or world affairs. He is kinda like Barrack Obama in that regard.
Either way he is better suited as a democrat and he should have simply challenged Obama in a democratic primary. American conservatives would *never* nominate a nut-covered-cheese-log like Ron Paul I assure you.
He'll probably run some kind of half-assed independent campaign and throw the election to Obama and be relegated to the embittered-crackpot category like Ralph Nader.
So just because you say so or someone else says so or some newspaper / tv person who doesn't know up from down reads a pre-scripted talking point from a teleprompter ... that makes it true. That is the golden standard for judging what is accurate information, right? If he's a kook, PROVE IT.
You tried a little with the islamofascist comment, but that just doesn't hold water. Not because I say so, but because there is no proof of that. You might as well call him Chinese, there is no proof of that either. Maybe he's a watermelon, but there's no proof of that either. Same with isolationist, there's zero proof of that.
Here's an idea. Before tossing out words, quickly think about their definition. Then, with the definition fixed solidly in your cerebral cortex, compare that to reality. See if they match, then follow this rule: if they do not match, the words are not accurate and will make you look pretty silly when trying to use them.
Like calling him a Democrat, clearly you do have any understanding of the basic definition and diffference between Democrat and Republican. I don't know how else to put it, you couldn't be more wrong. You are not just wrong, you are exactly wrong!
Nut covered cheese log? Long on ad hominem bullocks, short on anything material to the point trying to be made.
Ralph Nader sounds about 1000x smarter than you do. Who calls him a crackpot? The same talking point repeating retards who can rhyme of sports statistics up your wazoo but can't find Australia on a map? The same lovely ladies who say, "I don't ask those questions I just choose to BELIEVE"?
It appears like there is nothing new here, just someone ignorantly repeating / slandering what they heard on tv, or their friends say or what they perceive as popular and trendy. Because that's what is important. Being in the mainstream is a sure sign of being right, right?