Boycott NIKE!

This notion that half of the country is supporting Trump is ridiculous. Many voted for him cause they didn't like HRC. his base the most is about %30 of the country which I can safely assume %60 of them are not the type who wear Nike.

There have been other companies that were boycotted by the conservatives and they are doing well like Starbucks, Walmart, Netflix, Kellogg's, Amazon and Keurig to name a few.

I'm someone who voted for Trump because I hated Hillary. I don't consider myself his base. I also don't buy Nike, regardless of this stupid advert.

As for companies like Starbucks, Target, etc...doing well, some aren't doing as well as they could have been because they chose to step into something they shouldn't have gotten involved in. That is the point. Shareholders invest in a company for profit, not because they want the CEO or CMO to go off on some half baked social justice campaign.
 
Looks like I was right. Nike made an intentional choice to give the finger to half the country in a desperate bid to lock up the ghetto customer base.

Report: Nike Chose Kaepernick Because Their Customer Base Is ‘Significantly Urban’

According to a new report, Nike fully understood the beehive it would stir by making Colin Kaepernick the face of its “Just Do It” campaign, but decided to do it anyway because the company’s fan base is “significantly urban.”
According to TMZ the move to put national anthem protester Colin Kaepernick on its 30th anniversary “Just Do It” ad campaign was a “shrewd business move,” which was also “part cultural.”



A source inside Nike told TMZ that the company fully understood millions of Americans would be upset with the choice of putting Kaepernick on the ad. However, the company reckoned that since most of its customer base is black, it would be a financial benefit in the long run.

The move to sign Kaepernick to the ad was also a move away from the NFL as a corporate entity and toward individual athletes who are increasingly turning into social justice warriors.

The signal Nike reportedly hopes to send to young, up-and-coming athletes is that Nike is on their side, not the side of the corporations they may eventually work for.

“Our sources say Nike has made a calculated decision to become ‘a partner in social change,'” TMZ reported.

Just ahead of the debut of the Kaepernick ad, a recent poll noted a wide gulf between blacks and whites over the now ubiquitous protests during the national anthem at NFL games.

The recent poll by NBC found that far more blacks approved of the anthem protests than whites: 70 percent of black respondents say protesting is the right thing to do, while 28 percent say no. Meanwhile, 58 percent of whites say the protests are not appropriate, while 38 percent say they are.

With numbers like this, it would be unsurprising that an “urban” customer base could find Colin Kaepernick to be an appealing spokesman.

https://www.breitbart.com/sports/20...e-their-customer-base-is-significantly-urban/

Yeah, but, who actually has monies to spend on NIKE products and how many blacks vs whites are part of the consumer universe? I think more people are ticked off but, the effects of boycotts will take awhile! Still, if enough consumers stay away and buy other similar products, it has damage the size of their profits! When demand goes down on any product, it is the beginning of their end!
 
You must not be paying your assistant very much. They can't even afford name brand shoes for their kids.

This is what poverty looks like.
upload_2018-9-6_9-53-16.png
 
Brought to you by KKK. You already shown us your true colors, beltboy. Why the overkill?

Oh sorry, I forgot we are supposed to ignore crime by blacks or immigrants now. Otherwise we are "racist." I'll make up for it by posting some pics of whites looting a shoe store..... damn that racist Google, they seem to have hidden them all.
 
Back
Top