Boy this Tyreek Hill is really something
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
Clinton vs Trump about the same period(right after he got the nomination) So Biden's not doing as well as Clinton at the same point and we know how that turned out.
Attachments
And Hillary got more votes just as the polls stated.
Last edited:
Even though Trump eeked out a fluke 80,000 EC vote win after losing by millions of overall votes Id still rather be on the side of the polls
Hopefully your parents gave you a vasectomy at birth. Your BF Lacesout needs a buttbuddy to share season tickets with.
And she lost - got trounced on the scoreboard where it matters...
because in case you don't know - popular votes are irrelevant...
The majority of the polls had her becoming president
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
THEY
WERE
WRONG
1.Winning The EC by 80,000 votes while loseing by 3 million isn't trounced.
2.National polls predict who will get the most votes not the most electoral votes.
3.The cadidate who gets the most votes has a 90% of winning the election so the forecasters were not wrong saying she had an 85% chance of winning.
4.When Trump loses by 15 million votes in 2020 The EC wont save his ass.
Winning the Electoral College 304-227 = trounced.
National Polls predict who will win the Presidency. During the 2016 election, "pre-election polls fueled high-profile predictions that Hillary Clinton's likelihood of winning the presidency was about 90 percent, with estimates ranging from 71 to over 99 percent
(https://www.aapor.org/Education-Res...uation-of-2016-Election-Polls-in-the-U-S.aspx)
LOL and fucking giggggity.
The walls are closing in.
It's over!
Maybe in 2020...but definitely in 2024.
Then we will show them!
Winning by 80,000 votes= Fluke
National polls=national vote
Hillary's likelyhood of winning was indeed 90%
2016=3 million
2018=10 million
2020= 15 million +