Both The financial times & the Economist endorse Obama

[oktiri]

You know, the paper/ weekly "communists" read.

http://www.economist.com/world/unit...fm?story_id=12516666&source=features_box_main

 

[seneca_roman]

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[stock_trad3r]

The only people who read the Economist are aloof limousine liberals and trust fund liberals. How many independents read the Economist? none. How many independents give a **** about colon bowel endorsement? none.

 

[Thunderdog]

Quote from oktiri:

You know, the paper/ weekly "communists" read.

http://www.economist.com/world/unit...fm?story_id=12516666&source=features_box_main

That was some fine reading. Excellent article. Thanks for the link.

 

[Thunderdog]

Quote from stock_trad3r:

The only people who read the Economist are aloof limousine liberals and trust fund liberals. How many independents read the Economist? none. How many independents give a **** about colon bowel endorsement? none.

Not surprisingly, you are missing the point. Look at the quality of the source. Consider the caliber of its readership and, therefore, the quality of the material:

http://ads.economist.com/the-economist/testimonials/

 

[stock_trad3r]

The newspaper is headquartered in London. Go figure.

 

[Thunderdog]

Quote from stock_trad3r:

The newspaper is headquartered in London. Go figure.

The newspaper is a magazine. Go figure.