Quote from Jreality:
I just got a Penson 1099-B, and shares bought in 2011 that were really REPLACEMENT SHARES for shares that were originally bought in 2010 (but which had been sold at a loss in 2011) were treated as there were NOT replacement shares. They were treated as brand-new purchases, even though bought back less than 30 days after the previous sale.
..........
How do I handle this? Should they be correcting the 1099 for me?
ADD: Now that I think about it, this is alarming, because, on the 1099-B it makes it look like I now have more gains than I should. Can I demand Penson correct the 1099?