Funny that Jesse Livermore always repaid his debt as soon as he could. He was in large part consistently profitable. Perhaps he understood more than anyone else about debt when he shot his brains out - the game is over when you are in debt. He understood the nature of the game, while most would regard gambling against the banks as a business, as an investment.
Experienced Joe and Loyek590, I think you and others are missing what I am proposing. I am not proposing pure debt. The interest free debt is matched by savings outside of the trading account. I am suggesting that you're better to trade an interest free loan than risk your savings. By trading your savings, you leave yourself in a position where debt is your only option if you lose your trading account and an emergency occurs.
Theoretical numbers:
Invested savings of $10,000. Borrow through an interest free loan another $10,000. The debt is matched by the savings. There is no risk here aside from losing your savings if you're forced to cover your debt with the savings. The benefit? The $10,000 savings continues to earn a traditional investment return. The loan is traded and at best the trading income is used to pay off the debt.
This is a superior approach to simply trading your savings.
Anyhow, there is still some risk for me since I'd rather pay a little interest for a few months then give up my savings. So, I still don't want to lose the borrowed money and find myself paying almost 20%.
Last edited: