book shelf

walter, surf

i will ask my statistician and my mathematician what they know and what we could bring to testing soon. i am usually reluctant to use complexity, since i found it to be very often waste of time. do not know why. it might be that the development just takes more time and while you test hundreds of simple things you can only implement very few more complex concepts. so i learned to use resources for complex things only when i already got indication towwards a specific topic.


peace to you
 
Quote from Walther:

You are saying it like old is not good ..
Pythagoras, Newton, Fermi, Bohr & co. = still good and valid probably for ever .
I go a few steps past " structural analysis "
More...

Dude, you and Fermi or Bohr? Yet another fake claiming to be an expert on everything... I don't think you would even be able to derive Bohr's model of the hydrogen atom. And as far as Fermi is concerned he had nothing to do with geometry. Period.
 
Quote from electron:

Dude, you and Fermi or Bohr? Yet another fake claiming to be an expert on everything... I don't think you would even be able to derive Bohr's model of the hydrogen atom. And as far as Fermi is concerned he had nothing to do with geometry. Period.
More...

And as far as your comprehension of written text is concerned. you are on pre K grade level .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top