Quote from Rearden Metal:
Please feel free to rebuff Niederhoffer's arguments against TA , AFTER you've read them.
Rearden,
What do you use to make your trade decisions?
Mechanical, discretionary, price action only, indicators, economics...what?
I've been around for over +14 years as a trader and a lot longer than that via being associated with family and friends that are successful retail traders or ex-floor traders.
Technical analysis works.
Note: I haven't tested nor traded EVERY single chart pattern.
However...I will say this...I've read dozens of reports, articles or stories by traders and non-traders that test a specific chart pattern or numerous chart patterns and come to the conclusion...
that chart patterns are not profitable over the tested period.
Such raises an interesting question that
many that do these tests...
fail to raise.
What is it that allows successful traders that do use technical analysis
over many years...
to succeed in an area where a computer that crunches numbers is unable to duplicate the results of patterns used by successful traders?
Is it possible...that many of these tests were done by someone applying a
specific trade methodology while testing the chart pattern...
in which the trade methodology (how to trade...how to test the pattern) is what failed and not the chart pattern?
Is it
common sense that a computer cannot measure?
Does common sense falls within the category of a discretionary trader?
Therefore...I've come to the conclusion...
indicators and chart patterns don't make profits.
It's the trader that is the deciding factor while using those indicators and chart patterns (trading tools).
Someone once said...technical analysis is like a hammer to the skill carpenter or a scalpel to a skill surgeon.
Remove the skill surgeon and carpenter and input someone that doesn't know how to correctly use these tools...
you got failure.
Thus...it's unimaginable that every successful trader I know online or in person that uses TA successfully...
are all liars.
Geeeshh...if this was true...
this would be better than the Single Bullet Theory concerning JFK assination.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sbt.htm
Maybe that's the flaw with
data mining.
Statisticians are fond of pointing out that if you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything.
Just some thoughts for those that enjoy contemplating about stuff like this.
NihabaAshi