Bono Praises very low Tax Rate for Unparalleled Prosperity

Reminds me of a good joke:

That actually happened. And when I heard about it, I actually almost crashed my car!:D
Scoured the net for a clip of it, and and is one of those places in time where something wasn't being recorded by someone. I did hear he almost stopped what he was doing, trying to figure out what to do next!:D And the version I heard (no doubt a Scottsman who'd had a few pints, lol), "Well, then stop 'fuken' clappin', you evil bastard!" :D:DMakes me roll to this day, as that's my kind of humor! Minus the pints, of course. Lol
And gotta say, I've never had a bone to pick with Bono, besides a worry about his stance on firearms ownership by free people.. None the less, if that had been me on stage, would have had to take a few minutes to stop laughing, and saying that was a good one! Lol!
 
let me guess ricter and convertibility think raising taxes is good for the economy and believe somehow the 2008 recession depression in the middle of the chart is a counter to the growth seen by even Bono.

lets look at reality of low tax policies...



Irish_GDPDebt_Ratio_Chart.jpg




Ireland was transformed from one of the poorest countries in Western Europe to one of the wealthiest. Disposable income soared to record levels, enabling a huge rise in consumer spending with foreign holidays accounting for over 91% of total holiday expenditure in 2004. However, the gap between the highest and lowest income households widened in the five-year period to 2004-2005;[33] in response, the Economic and Social Research Institute(ESRI) stated in 2002: "On balance, budgets over the past 10 to 20 years have been more favourable to high income groups than low income groups, but particularly so during periods of high growth".[34] Unemployment fell from 18% in the late 1980s to 4.5% by the end of 2007,[35] and average industrial wages grew at one of the highest rates in Europe. Inflation brushed 5% per annum towards the end of the "Tiger" period, pushing Irish prices up to those of Nordic Europe, even though wage rates are roughly the same as in the UK. The national debt had remained constant during the boom, but the GDP to debt ratio rose, due to the dramatic rise in GDP.[36]

The new wealth resulted in large investments in modernising Irish infrastructure and cities. The National Development Plan led to improvements in roads, and new transport services were developed, such as the Luas light rail lines, the Dublin Port Tunnel, and the extension of the Cork Suburban Rail. Local authorities enhanced city streets and built monuments such as the Spire of Dublin.[37]
I bet I can find European countries with higher taxes and stronger recoveries than Ireland's, lol.
 
Conclusion
"This review of empirical studies of taxes and economic growth indicates that there are not a lot of dissenting opinions coming from peer-reviewed academic journals. More and more, the consensus among experts is that taxes on corporate and personal income are particularly harmful to economic growth, with consumption and property taxes less so. This is because economic growth ultimately comes from production, innovation, and risk-taking....."

http://taxfoundation.org/article/what-evidence-taxes-and-growth
 
exactly...

Conclusion
"This review of empirical studies of taxes and economic growth indicates that there are not a lot of dissenting opinions coming from peer-reviewed academic journals. More and more, the consensus among experts is that taxes on corporate and personal income are particularly harmful to economic growth, with consumption and property taxes less so. This is because economic growth ultimately comes from production, innovation, and risk-taking....."

http://taxfoundation.org/article/what-evidence-taxes-and-growth
 
What Really Is the Evidence on Taxes and Growth?

A 2012 Tax Foundation report asserted that “nearly every empirical study of taxes and economic growth published in a peer-reviewed academic journal finds that tax increases harm economic growth.”[2] The report cited 26 studies (19 on the impact of federal or national taxes on national growth and seven on the effects of state taxes on state growth), claiming that 23 of them find that taxes have a “negative” effect on economic growth, while the other three find a “neutral” effect. A previous CBPP analysis found that the Tax Foundation misrepresented the findings of three of the seven state-level studies it cited.[3] This analysis looks in detail at the 19 national-level studies and finds:

  • The Tax Foundation mischaracterized, exaggerated, or selectively described the findings of six of those 19. When one adds to these six studies the three state-level studies that the Tax Foundation misrepresented and the three studies that the Tax Foundation correctly identified as showing a “neutral” effect of taxes on growth,12 of the 26 studies that the Tax Foundation cites do not support its flat assertion that tax increases harm growth.
  • The Tax Foundation’s review omitted dozens of relevant studies published in major journals or edited compilations since 2000, many of which conclude that levels of taxation have little if any impact on economic growth or that adverse impacts are limited to particular taxes or time periods.
  • The Tax Foundation’s assertion of a growing “consensus among experts” that taxes harm growth is false. In fact, studies that the Tax Foundation cited, as well as others that it omitted, explicitly note the lack of academic consensus.
.....
Half of National Studies Cited Do Not Fully Support Tax Foundation Claim

....
Tax Foundation Review Omitted Recent Studies That Contradict Its Claims......




-----------------
-----------------

In other words, someone had employed a republican mind at the Tax Foundation.
 
A powerful analysis by President Barack Obama’s first Chair of his Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) indicates the President’s proposed tax increases would kill the economic recovery and throw nearly 1 million Americans out of work. Those are the extraordinary implications of academic research by Christina D. Romer, who chaired the CEA from January 28, 2009 – September 3, 2010. In a paper entitled: “The Macrcoeconomic Effects of Tax Changes” published by the prestigious American Economic Review in June 2010 (during her tenure at the White House), she stated: “In short, tax increases appear to have a very large, sustained, and highly significant negative impact on output.”


http://www.forbes.com/sites/charles...romer-knows-tax-hikes-will-kill-the-recovery/
 
Back
Top