Quote from steveosborne:
I'm back.
I still see 10 year notes moving from 109 to 114 but I won't try to hide the fact that my timing was bad. I now see the catalyst to be next week's FOMC meeting, something that would be much more typical with bonds.
I agree with your reasoning but I put exceptional weight on those meetings because of the way they have influenced short term trends in the past -- especially recently (May 3, June 29/30 and Aug 9) at times when Fed communication didn't contain anything new. Another reason is the build up of signals I'm getting.Quote from landboy:
Shouldn't it be more of the same at the meeting, increases at measured pace, inflation a risk to the economy, blah blah blah... i doubt there's gonna be little language in there to turn things around no?
Quote from steveosborne:
I agree with your reasoning but I put exceptional weight on those meetings because of the way they have influenced short term trends in the past -- especially recently (May 3, June 29/30 and Aug 9) at times when Fed communication didn't contain anything new. Another reason is the build up of signals I'm getting.
I thought a month ago that bonds were about to shoot up because of bullish signals coming out from 10 Yr Note prices but since then, those signals became stronger and, more importantly, are now confirmed by similar signals extracted from 5 Yr Note and 30 Yr Bond prices. It was a mistake to prematuraly use a good but unconfirmed indicator.