Quote from MoveTimer:
John,
thanks, I'm waiting in breathless anticipation. Hope you didn't miss YM pivot times today
Good luck!
MoveTimer,
Here is the article that broke the story back in 1997.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/longterm/blackm/plunge.htm
Since then a number of articles have been written to include most recently in late 2006.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/1026200...e_plunge_protectors_business_john_crudele.htm
Here is the actual report of the President's Working Group. No need to read this as it is rather dry.
http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/reports/hedgfund.pdf
Here is another report by the Working Group indicating that they are still active:
http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/dome...nstitution/terrorism-insurance/pdf/report.pdf
Here are articles by authors who may have taken things a little further than necessary, however still important points are made:
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/reality/2005/0403.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/decoster/decoster114.html
So, how does the above have anything to do with my playful use of the "Working Group" phrase as well as the phrase, "important work is being done here" ?
Well, while I have some misgivings that any single group can successfully manipulate the market, I have no doubt that a single group or groups working together can nudge the market in a certain direction. Like for example, yesterday all eyes were on Asia before Monday's EST/CST open. What if over the weekend the WG decided to focus their influence on the SPI (Australia)? Now of course rationally we all know that is absurd, but what if via whatever data mining techniques they have at their disposal, they've determined that if the SPI moves one way and in a certain pattern after a market plunge the preceding week, that the Western markets will follow suit? Keep in mind that in my more plausible scenario the idea isn't to completely change the course of a bear market. The idea is to guide it in a certain more structured, more rational direction.
The idea goes hand in hand with choosing the lesser of two evils.
Also, why the SPI, why not the HSI or the NIKKEI? If you understand data mining the most obvious choice isn't always the most logical. The most obvious choice isn't always the most profitable or efficient. In any event, my use of the SPI in the above hypothetical example was meant to simply illustrate a possible largest bang for the WG's buck type situation.
How do I use the above in my trading? I admit that I borrowed the phrase "working group" to describe what I believe to be a group of smart money players who are establishing areas of value. They are expending an enormous amount of energy and effort at certain key areas and certain key times, hence my phrase, "important work is being done here."
Is my WG manipulating the market and the same as the official Presidential Working Group? No certainly not. Is my WG truly in the know and have I been able to see the patterns that indicate where they are placing support and resistance points? Yes, I believe my WG represents the smart money and I believe I've determined a way to see the patterns that they are establishing key points of support and resistance, what I term the WGSR. This is not simple eyeball the chart and draw horizontal S/R. This goes beyond that.