A re-education camp, perhaps?
Yeah, he is a smart guy for sure but he needs to spend some more time on BTC to fully understand what's going on. It's not an easy job for him because he's coming from 40 years of experience in the fiat system, which unfortunately for him, is a barrier to fully grasping the true nature and revolutionary significance of Bitcoin in our financial system.
In the video, he questions the idea of Bitcoin being an anonymous money transfer system at its core and then says, "So why would anyone want to buy Bitcoin through a regulated exchange via an ETF?" implying that buying through an exchange pretty much kills the entire anonymous underpinning of Bitcoin, and thus exposes the buyer to be tracked.
But it's a dumb argument for two reasons:
1. He doesn't understand that institutional buyers couldn't just outright purchase BTC without an ETF in place because their corporate charters prohibited that activity. So for them, a BTC ETF is literally the gateway to accumulating BTC as a portion of their investment portfolios.
2. Not everybody cares about privacy in the way he's assuming. Any hedge fund manager is fully aware his investment activities are tracked and monitored, so why would he care that his crypto investments could be tracked? If you're buying BTC in an ethical manner with no ties to criminal activity, do you really care if you can be tracked? I make credit card purchases all the time but I"m not shaking in my boots because someone viewed my statement and discoverd that I spent over $100 at Chic-fil-A last month. I'm not dealing crack. I'm buying chicken nuggets. See what I mean?
But he seems to think that being tracked via BTC ETF exposure contradicts the idea of Bitcoin itself, and therefore invalidates the concept of buying BTC in the first place, and I can't understand that logic at all.