Boehner Goes Full RINO On Trade Vote ‘Defectors,’ Kicks Three Off Whip Team For Not Backing Bill

Speaker John Boehner is sending a stern message to his Republican conference: Either you’re on the team or you’re not.

House GOP leaders booted three conservative members off the whip team for voting against a procedural rule last week that structured how a trade package was brought to the floor.

Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) informed Reps. Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.), Steve Pearce (N.M.) and Trent Franks (Ariz.) on Monday that they were no longer a part of the GOP’s vote-counting operation, a source close to the whip team confirmed.
And leadership may not be done with defectors just yet.

Boehner (R-Ohio) and his allies could strip gavels from a handful of subcommittee chairmen who voted against the trade rule as well.

“That is probably the next near-term thing,” said a GOP lawmaker who is close to leadership.

Four of the roughly three-dozen Republicans who voted against the trade rule are subcommittee chairmen on the influential Oversight and Financial Services panels: Reps. Scott Garrett (N.J.), Mark Meadows (N.C.), Jim Jordan (Ohio) and Lummis. Franks is chairman of a Judiciary subcommittee.

Three others, Reps. Louie Gohmert (Texas), John Fleming (La.) and Jim Bridenstine (Okla.), hold subcommittee chairmanships on the Science and Natural Resources committees.

Meadows and Garrett faced potential threats of losing their subcommittee chairmanships after voting against Boehner for Speaker in January. While they escaped punishment, Boehner did exact revenge against two Florida Republicans who voted to deny him a third term as Speaker.

Rep. Dan Webster ran against Boehner for the top leadership job, while Rep. Richard Nugent voted for Webster. Both subsequently lost their seats on the Rules Committee, where loyalty to leadership is expected.

A Boehner spokesman had no comment Tuesday about any future retribution.

On Monday afternoon, Scalise’s chief of staff made calls to top aides for Lummis, Pearce and Franks to tell them they were off the team, sources said. The calls were described as “cordial” and “professional,” almost apologetic, sources said.

The majority whip’s decision was based on longstanding whip team rules that state members must “vote as a team on procedural matters” but are free to vote against leadership on underlying legislation, the whip team source said.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/245228-payback-boehner-hits-back-at-gop-defectors
 
Sends a nice message to all those overly ambitious twats, in congress who think they are going to be the next president, Tow the line and vote with the establishment, or lose your job, is it any wonder why we end up with parties that walk march lock step with what the establishment wants?
 
how many times can he pull that crap til he alienates enough to be voted out of his speakership. I will bet its very close right now.
hopefully they dump him very soon.

If I ever hear these establishment Rs and Ds ( traitors all) speak of service to the country or patriotism I will puke.
 
He doesn't remember how his party got back into power during the last few cycles. He'll remember when the dems regain the house next cycle because no one from the base will come out to vote for republicans. Does he care? No. He has his piece of the pie. He is bought and paid for, and most likely set for life as are most of today's national politicians.
 
Last edited:
When Obama wanted to raise taxes on the wealthiest, the argument was that it would hurt "the job creators", so it was opposed. But now that Obama wants to (apparently) benefit "the job creators", via the TPP, it's opposed.
 
Last edited:
When Obama wanted to raise taxes on the wealthiest, the argument was that it would hurt "the job creators", so it was opposed. But now that Obama wants to (apparently) benefit "the job creators", via the TPP, it's opposed.
do you think maybe Pelosi is a closet racist and is only opposing Obama because he is not Italian?
 
I think raising taxes on the wealthy was a good idea all along.
how much should we raise taxes on the wealthy? What is your plan? Do you have a rate? When does a person become wealthy? Have you really thought this through? Or are you just talking out of your ass like a democrat to make yourself feel good? The "wealthy" don't have enough money even if you taxed it all to pay for what you democrats want.
 
how much should we raise taxes on the wealthy? What is your plan? Do you have a rate? When does a person become wealthy? Have you really thought this through? Or are you just talking out of your ass like a democrat to make yourself feel good? The "wealthy" don't have enough money even if you taxed it all to pay for what you democrats want.
I'll let the accountants sweat the details, and merely agree with the principle. But feel free to disagree with the principle.
 
Back
Top