Is this the problem
View attachment 323340
from when she was a hooker?
Is this the problem
View attachment 323340
sexdoll threads>>Is this the problem
View attachment 323340
the level of mental gymnastics....
Here BS, this is what happened:
Hobert gets kicked out for vaping
Hobert badmouths the venue and says it was "political/because of who I am"
Venue shows receipts of her vaping proving her a liar.
Venue throws in extra spicy footage for being slanderous lying ho.
...
Personally I only tell a stranger to go fuck themselves* once every couple of months if that in person but Hoebert must do that a LOT if she can't remember.
* and that's usually giving the finger driving.
So the end justifies the means? Search and seizure laws are obsolete now? To be fair, a discussion on what is a reasonable expectation of privacy in a public place, but it in the dark seems to be warranted here.
As far as displays of affection in public are concerned, are you comparing displays deliberately taking place in full lighted views on stage in front an audience consisting of children with displays requiring advanced infrared capability to see? Hmmmmm?
Is anyone saying her actions were illegal?
I've been waiting for a response by those on the Right concerning this video characterized as "Security Footage" by the Left. Unfortunately, it seems critical thinking is not often practiced here.
Some hints:
1. The "Security footage" has a narrow angle of view and is almost perfectly centered on Boebert and friend. Compare to how "Security footage" usually looks, such as ubiquitous police shows on TV.
2. The place where the show took place is almost certainly dark except for the stage, bringing into question how public the couples interaction really was.
3. The footage is extraordinarily high quality, especially given the apparent lighting conditions, further suggesting the camera involved was not a "security" camera. In fact, the camera is presumably a portable camera with such cutting edge capabilities it is associated with military and top law enforcement grade surveillance capability. This begs the question of whether it was appropriate or even legal to use such capability without a warrant.
4. The above apparent facts were not mentioned in the article, suggesting a political hit job rather than "merely reporting the news".
5. Was does the above level of surveillance suggest about the current state of our political system and personal freedoms in the Biden Administration?