why are you defending blatant exhibitionism in a kid's show?
Is it "Exhibitionism" if no one can see you? Is it overreaching surveillance to use "See in the dark cameras" against citizens for the purpose of political gain?
why are you defending blatant exhibitionism in a kid's show?
I've been waiting for a response by those on the Right concerning this video characterized as "Security Footage" by the Left. Unfortunately, it seems critical thinking is not often practiced here.
Some hints:
1. The "Security footage" has a narrow angle of view and is almost perfectly centered on Boebert and friend. Compare to how "Security footage" usually looks, such as ubiquitous police shows on TV.
2. The place where the show took place is almost certainly dark except for the stage, bringing into question how public the couples interaction really was.
3. The footage is extraordinarily high quality, especially given the apparent lighting conditions, further suggesting the camera involved was not a "security" camera. In fact, the camera is presumably a portable camera with such cutting edge capabilities it is associated with military and top law enforcement grade surveillance capability. This begs the question of whether it was appropriate or even legal to use such capability without a warrant.
4. The above apparent facts were not mentioned in the article, suggesting a political hit job rather than "merely reporting the news".
5. Was does the above level of surveillance suggest about the current state of our political system and personal freedoms in the Biden Administration?
.Is it "Exhibitionism" if no one can see you? Is it overreaching surveillance to use "See in the dark cameras" against citizens for the purpose of political gain?
Blowbert ... lol
Is anyone saying her actions were illegal?She was in a public space....just because the lights go down in the theater does not mean she is protected and cna do sexual acts in a theater....
Sorry you can do Simone Biles gymnastics to find out why the camera was on her but it doesnt change what she did....
You are acting like whatever purpose the camera serverd, what it recorded was absolutely fake and never happened.... stop blaming the camera in such detail when all a camera does is reveal what exactly happened.
Whether the camera was purposely aimed at her or not, she did what she did and she can go fuck herself with her hypocrisy.
So the end justifies the means? Search and seizure laws are obsolete now? To be fair, a discussion on what is a reasonable expectation of privacy in a public place, but it in the dark seems to be warranted here.
As far as displays of affection in public are concerned, are you comparing displays deliberately taking place in full lighted views on stage in front an audience consisting of children with displays requiring advanced infrared capability to see? Hmmmmm?
Is anyone saying her action were illegal?

Is anyone saying her action were illegal?