Bobulinski

[exGOPer]

More ad hominem from the boomers, can't even address their bullshit with a straight face.

Booblonsky did business with Biden's in 2017 allegedly, why is this an issue? Trading their names for cash is Trumptard life motto.

 

[PintoFire]

You do understand the time period involved in this 'corruption' is 2017? When both Biden and Obama were out of office?

Also zero evidence has been presented, just a lot of accusations by a desperate campaign with nothing to run on. WSJ looked at the 'texts' and found no mention of Biden, as for Hunter Biden's nepotism, how is that an issue when Donald's daughter and son in law run the government?

Thanks for pointing out where the issue is. I can see why you would think that now. Go back and do some more research. That's not correct at all. I'm talking about all of his dealings. All of his corruption.

 

[LacesOut]

Where is the laptop? Why would anyone care about corruption and nepotism after Trump?

At least Biden is not a child rapist like Trump, who took part in orgies with Epstein? Want source?

Whatabout whatabout whatabout
There is no source. Just liessss and innuendo.
That’s the libtard way.

 

[elderado]

Do it.

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/banks-backs-biden-foia-request/

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I don't think you're understanding the magnitude of the corruption we are talking about under Biden.

Judging by your handle, you got rear-ended, so to speak, and it still burns.

 

[exGOPer]

Whatabout whatabout whatabout
There is no source. Just liessss and innuendo.
That’s the libtard way.

Says the moron who predicted Hillary will be in jail, whatever happened to Uranium One?

Cry more inbred, more to come in a week.

 

[exGOPer]

Thanks for pointing out where the issue is. I can see why you would think that now. Go back and do some more research. That's not correct at all. I'm talking about all of his dealings. All of his corruption.

Research what? Booblinsky hasn't released any public evidence, neither did he allow journalists to see the so called texts - WSJ reviewed some of them and said it didn't involve Bidens at all. So what am I supposed to research here? You are welcome to link me to reliable sources.

 

[PintoFire]

There's plenty of evidence. What are you looking for... a personally signed letter from Biden saying he did it?!

Even Jim Biden said plausible deniability is how they get away with it. Here is a perfect example of how people with deny everything.

 

[exGOPer]

There's plenty of evidence. What are you looking for.

Evidence that Joe Biden was involved in any of the business, if there is plenty of evidence for that, surely you can link me to it and I don't mean some guy accusing someone of something while being sponsored by a campaign - business involves papers and communication, link me to something like that because both WSJ and Fox News say that they found no link with Joe Biden and Boobowsky.

 

[PintoFire]

Evidence that Joe Biden was involved in any of the business, if there is plenty of evidence for that, surely you can link me to it and I don't mean some guy accusing someone of something while being sponsored by a campaign - business involves papers and communication, link me to something like that because both WSJ and Fox News say that they found no link with Joe Biden and Boobowsky.

No you're clearly too retarded. Your field is not in any of the hard sciences. I'm sure of that. Because you couldn't think your way out of a paper bag.