BLM Co-Founder Admits: “Our Goal Is To Get Trump Out”

Thinking about the question, imo the reason for the majority of large riot/protests in democratically run cities is because the powers that be in those cities allow it.

The right to peacefully protest is constitutional, rioting, vandalism etc. is not. These violent protests should be put down but they are not as they further the narrative.

BLM’s message has been taken over by the fringe left and mixed with that of antifa and other anti-government elements.

I truly believe they are just a part of the overall movement, DNC included, to reshape the US into a NWO/UN led state. Once the DNC gains control you’ll see the protests swing against specific constitutional issues. All backed by the MSM’s continued propaganda. If they can’t accomplish it legally, by election, they’ll continue to create as much havoc as they can in an attempt to divide.

Attempts at placating the mob only emboldens it. Sooner or later it must be squashed. Before that happens Mr. and Mrs. John Q Public will have to have had their fill of the bullshit and demand something be done.

Maybe it will happen in November at the polls, a Red Wave to retake the soul of this Nation. if not it’s only going to get worse.
Trump wins the lid blows off completely, they'll launch an assualt on every major city in the country. Democrat wins it'll slow that process down, but the objective will be the same, that objective just as you outlined.
The fight is coming, now, little later, it's coming. How bad, how long? That depends on our government and the response to the mob violence. Hard line response from government and it ends quicker than if the government folds up and American citizens are left to do the dirty work.
 
Yeah, like we believe that. Trump may be the "current" problem but they'll find many "new" problems along the way, regardless.


These "innocent protesters" still refer to Obama as "President Obama".

The level of petty they'll stoop to is undefined. For a bunch of lunatic leftists claiming that "magatards" won't accept an election defeat it's been nearly 4 years and they still don't recognize Trump as president.

Leftism is projection taken to an absolute art form. Where is the racism? Look no further than the Democrats and marxist left in the streets.
 
These "innocent protesters" still refer to Obama as "President Obama".

The level of petty they'll stoop to is undefined.

That is the correct verbiage for addressing any past President, Bush, Carter, Clinton, Obama et al.
 
That is the correct verbiage for addressing any past President.

http://www.formsofaddress.info/FOA_president_US_former.html

Wrong.

"Former President", "President from X to Y", or "Mr/Mrs XYZ" is the proper form. Everything else is thought control through the manipulation of words. It's common in the media for obvious reasons. They may not like President XYZ so they will refer to their favored candidate using the wrong form as a dog whistle to the lunatics they preach to.

EDIT:

Example of proper use in left-leaning media:

 
https://emilypost.com/advice/addressing-a-former-president-of-the-united-states/

When addressing a former President of the United States in a formal setting, the correct form is “Mr. LastName.” (“President LastName” or “Mr. President” are terms reserved for the current head of state.) This is true for other ex-officials, as well.

When talking about the person to a third party, on the other hand, it’s appropriate to say, “former President LastName.” This holds for introductions, as well: A current state governor is introduced as “Governor Tom Smith,” while you’d introduce an ex-governor as “former Governor Jim Bell.”

Now, let’s look a little closer. In an informal setting (such as a private lunch), it’s acceptable to use the title the ex-official held. Here, you could refer to former President Jimmy Carter as either “President Carter” or “Mr. Carter.”

Finally, if the person you’re lunching with held more than one previous position—say, judge and ambassador—you’ll want to know which title he or she prefers.
 
https://emilypost.com/advice/addressing-a-former-president-of-the-united-states/

When addressing a former President of the United States in a formal setting, the correct form is “Mr. LastName.” (“President LastName” or “Mr. President” are terms reserved for the current head of state.) This is true for other ex-officials, as well.

When talking about the person to a third party, on the other hand, it’s appropriate to say, “former President LastName.” This holds for introductions, as well: A current state governor is introduced as “Governor Tom Smith,” while you’d introduce an ex-governor as “former Governor Jim Bell.”

Now, let’s look a little closer. In an informal setting (such as a private lunch), it’s acceptable to use the title the ex-official held. Here, you could refer to former President Jimmy Carter as either “President Carter” or “Mr. Carter.”

Finally, if the person you’re lunching with held more than one previous position—say, judge and ambassador—you’ll want to know which title he or she prefers.


Congratulations on playing yourself.
 
These "innocent protesters" still refer to Obama as "President Obama".

The level of petty they'll stoop to is undefined. For a bunch of lunatic leftists claiming that "magatards" won't accept an election defeat it's been nearly 4 years and they still don't recognize Trump as president.

Leftism is projection taken to an absolute art form. Where is the racism? Look no further than the Democrats and marxist left in the streets.
Yes, the lefties are the lunatics
 
Back
Top